2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Choose a second rounder

Poll ended at Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:19 am

CB: McCoy
1
2%
CB: Terrell
0
No votes
DT: McDonald
32
48%
DT: Miller
3
5%
OL: Pregnon
11
17%
OL: Bisontis
3
5%
WR: Boston
9
14%
WR: Bernard
0
No votes
MISC: Other
7
11%
Total votes: 66

User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Post by Xramfan »

Who do we want?

Discuss
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,323
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 552 times
Received High Fives: 306 times

Unread post by rich72 »

Now we need a DT, WR, CB, and RB
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

DT and backup RB are glaring in particular
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, Curay7680
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

SkullCrusher wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:08 pm EVER!

He and Stukes are top RAS players, which is basically Al Davis speed on steroids and each are accomplished, where Al wouldn't care about that. May surprise.

In my world, we gravitate to a few posters pov's here on who we should draft as they permeate the same message every day.
Not saying their wrong, but I do think they effect us on who's who and how things should go.

I'm just glad we have a possible good linemen here and now we've hit my minimum viable OL talent acquisition for the off-season. I would have still like more, but how poorly we were coached and trusting Kubiak's system, perhaps they do know better. It's going to suck if the totally mis-calc'd here on the OL, but like WR's we have 2 two year players now who should be developing.

QB
S
OLB
G/C/T
Alright...
im at a b+ on the draft so far
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

we pick 102 4th rd

cb mccoy 88,keonte scott 83,muhammed 80
wr sarratt 79,skyler 79
dt zxavien 80,gracen 73
User avatar
Raider_Dave
Posts: 3,445
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
Has given High Fives: 4 times
Received High Fives: 191 times

Unread post by Raider_Dave »

Zuhn good pass blocker, not so good run blocker.
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

Zuhn to backup Miller and move Grant to RT? Or move Zuhn to RT?
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Malik Muhammad CB my guy in the 4th
User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

RickRyb wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:19 pm Zuhn to backup Miller and move Grant to RT? Or move Zuhn to RT?
He’ll be an interior lineman.
User avatar
riseNraid09
Posts: 1,449
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:46 pm
Location: The Ville, Ky (BIG BLUE NATION)
Has given High Fives: 106 times
Received High Fives: 153 times

Unread post by riseNraid09 »

All four picks thus far have been solid. anyone crying about the selected players is bitching for sport.
These users gave a High Five to the author riseNraid09 for the post (total 8):
rich_120, mstrbass2000, MexicanHulk, raider_kin, skullnbonz, rich72, raiderboyron, raidersince63
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

riseNraid09 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:23 pm All four picks thus far have been solid. anyone crying about the selected players is bitching for sport.
agree...we got good players and filled needs
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,098
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1218 times
Received High Fives: 448 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

Playing almost 40 games at Left tackle in the SEC is no slouch. If he ever has to play tackle in a pinch he won't be worthless at it
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
rich_120
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 9:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 43 times
Received High Fives: 43 times

Unread post by rich_120 »

riseNraid09 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:23 pm All four picks thus far have been solid. anyone crying about the selected players is bitching for sport.
Every single person in this forum is Webster's definition of arm-chair GM, lol. At the end of the day, we don't know shit about drafting. Sure, we might have an "idea," but for the love of all things football...just have fun! This, as are all drafts, is an absolute crap-shoot.
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:16 pm im at a b+ on the draft so far
I like the draft so far too. Even tho I would have went a different route in the 3rd round, they were still good picks &, ranked in that area. Both could out play that ranking too. I also didn't do too much deep diving into the OL & DE positions because I felt they were solid there. So I need to do more film study on these two. Cause I only did a little on Crawford &, less than that on Zuhn. I'd give the draft a B+/A- so far. Fernando & Stukes are great picks at huge positions of need. Crawford & Zuhn, I'm not too informed on but, at first glance, I'd say a B at least for now for both.

I wouldn't mind going with hybrid LB/S K.Louis next. A Stukes/Louis tandem at S would be sweet! Possibly tops in the league. & Raiders have been god awful for years in coverage defense in the middle of the field. This would change that.

I'd probably take Halten over Louis tho or, maybe Z.Harris too. WR D.Burks would be really nice too.
User avatar
Cruisin with Tooz
Posts: 1,456
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
Has given High Fives: 191 times
Received High Fives: 408 times

Unread post by Cruisin with Tooz »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:56 pm I'm by no means trashing the pick, I have no idea. That's just a far out move to make. Its impressive imo
Far out?????? Have you been watching The Mod Squad again? :smirk:
These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

Not wanting, but thinking Sarratt at 102.
Post Reply