2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
- Xramfan
- Posts: 17,923
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
- Has given High Fives: 682 times
- Received High Fives: 1279 times
2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
Who do we want?
Discuss
Discuss
- These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
DT and backup RB are glaring in particular
- These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 2):
- Goodtimes333, Curay7680
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
im at a b+ on the draft so farSkullCrusher wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:08 pm EVER!
He and Stukes are top RAS players, which is basically Al Davis speed on steroids and each are accomplished, where Al wouldn't care about that. May surprise.
In my world, we gravitate to a few posters pov's here on who we should draft as they permeate the same message every day.
Not saying their wrong, but I do think they effect us on who's who and how things should go.
I'm just glad we have a possible good linemen here and now we've hit my minimum viable OL talent acquisition for the off-season. I would have still like more, but how poorly we were coached and trusting Kubiak's system, perhaps they do know better. It's going to suck if the totally mis-calc'd here on the OL, but like WR's we have 2 two year players now who should be developing.
QB
S
OLB
G/C/T
Alright...
- These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
- MexicanHulk
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
we pick 102 4th rd
cb mccoy 88,keonte scott 83,muhammed 80
wr sarratt 79,skyler 79
dt zxavien 80,gracen 73
cb mccoy 88,keonte scott 83,muhammed 80
wr sarratt 79,skyler 79
dt zxavien 80,gracen 73
- Raider_Dave
- Posts: 3,445
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
- Has given High Fives: 4 times
- Received High Fives: 191 times
- RickRyb
- Posts: 1,530
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
- Location: SoCal
- Has given High Fives: 1271 times
- Received High Fives: 529 times
- Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1381 times
- Received High Fives: 774 times
- riseNraid09
- Posts: 1,449
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2023 7:46 pm
- Location: The Ville, Ky (BIG BLUE NATION)
- Has given High Fives: 106 times
- Received High Fives: 153 times
All four picks thus far have been solid. anyone crying about the selected players is bitching for sport.
- These users gave a High Five to the author riseNraid09 for the post (total 8):
- rich_120, mstrbass2000, MexicanHulk, raider_kin, skullnbonz, rich72, raiderboyron, raidersince63
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
agree...we got good players and filled needsriseNraid09 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:23 pm All four picks thus far have been solid. anyone crying about the selected players is bitching for sport.
- Goodtimes333
- Posts: 1,098
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1218 times
- Received High Fives: 448 times
Playing almost 40 games at Left tackle in the SEC is no slouch. If he ever has to play tackle in a pinch he won't be worthless at it
- These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post:
- MexicanHulk
- rich_120
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 9:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 43 times
- Received High Fives: 43 times
Every single person in this forum is Webster's definition of arm-chair GM, lol. At the end of the day, we don't know shit about drafting. Sure, we might have an "idea," but for the love of all things football...just have fun! This, as are all drafts, is an absolute crap-shoot.riseNraid09 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:23 pm All four picks thus far have been solid. anyone crying about the selected players is bitching for sport.
- MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 393 times
- Received High Fives: 169 times
I like the draft so far too. Even tho I would have went a different route in the 3rd round, they were still good picks &, ranked in that area. Both could out play that ranking too. I also didn't do too much deep diving into the OL & DE positions because I felt they were solid there. So I need to do more film study on these two. Cause I only did a little on Crawford &, less than that on Zuhn. I'd give the draft a B+/A- so far. Fernando & Stukes are great picks at huge positions of need. Crawford & Zuhn, I'm not too informed on but, at first glance, I'd say a B at least for now for both.
I wouldn't mind going with hybrid LB/S K.Louis next. A Stukes/Louis tandem at S would be sweet! Possibly tops in the league. & Raiders have been god awful for years in coverage defense in the middle of the field. This would change that.
I'd probably take Halten over Louis tho or, maybe Z.Harris too. WR D.Burks would be really nice too.
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,456
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 191 times
- Received High Fives: 408 times
Far out?????? Have you been watching The Mod Squad again?Goodtimes333 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:56 pm I'm by no means trashing the pick, I have no idea. That's just a far out move to make. Its impressive imo
- These users gave a High Five to the author Cruisin with Tooz for the post:
- Goodtimes333
- RickRyb
- Posts: 1,530
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
- Location: SoCal
- Has given High Fives: 1271 times
- Received High Fives: 529 times