Top 10 richest users

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
Post Reply

Choose a second rounder

Poll ended at Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:19 am

CB: McCoy
1
2%
CB: Terrell
0
No votes
DT: McDonald
32
48%
DT: Miller
3
5%
OL: Pregnon
11
17%
OL: Bisontis
3
5%
WR: Boston
9
14%
WR: Bernard
0
No votes
MISC: Other
7
11%
Total votes: 66
User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Unread post by Xramfan »

Who do we want?

Discuss
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
Top
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:43 pm Yeah we need a NT but the position is deep so there is time to vet our guy, as much as i’m a trenches guy i’ll say safety was as big a need as NT

We didn't reach for a safety we took a 2nd round guy in the second round

If i was you stay away from bridges if you get you knicker in this much of a twist about not drafting the guy you wanted
I agree we got 2 3rd and lots of good players left
Top
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

Surprised EMcW & Pregnon are still on the board.
Top
User avatar
Roll Tide Raider
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:26 am
Has given High Fives: 14 times
Received High Fives: 21 times

Unread post by Roll Tide Raider »

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:43 pm Yeah we need a NT but the position is deep so there is time to vet our guy, as much as i’m a trenches guy i’ll say safety was as big a need as NT

We didn't reach for a safety we took a 2nd round guy in the second round

If i was you stay away from bridges if you get you knicker in this much of a twist about not drafting the guy you wanted
I completely disagree. This draft is not deep with nose tackle talent. There are players available, but that doesn't mean they're any good. That's why the pick bothers me so much. I am in no way convinced there are good nose tackles out there. Hell, Miller was available too when we made our pick but even he was a reach for a true nose tackle. Defensive tackle, yes. Nose tackle? I'm not so sure.
These users gave a High Five to the author Roll Tide Raider for the post (total 2):
MexicanHulk, pfish57
Top
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:47 pm I have it on good authority that there are those in this forum who believe they are more qualified than Spytek and Leonard
You have obviously been given very good intel. :grin:
Top
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,408
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 857 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:18 pm His ACL was in 2024 he’ll be around 2 years removed from injury come the start of the season so it wasnt that recent

He also came back last year & was quite productive so is the injury really a worry
I wouldn't have taken him solely for that reason. His age is a legit concern too. I sincerely hope he pans out and becomes a HOF'er for us, and we do need S badly, so I don't hate the pick, but this one feels like a reach we didn't need to make. Was he really BPA or was he just BPA at that position?

In this case, BPA should've been the way to go.
Top
User avatar
Arsenal Raider
Posts: 1,770
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:40 am
Has given High Fives: 302 times
Received High Fives: 132 times

Unread post by Arsenal Raider »

Do they ignore NT and go Pregnon/Dunker and then Sarratt?
Top
User avatar
DrDUne
Posts: 4,580
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by DrDUne »

Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:38 pm Obviously, Spytek and Leonard didn't think McDonald was all that. No need to panic.
On the other hand, the Texans believed he was worth trading up for. And suffice it to say, they seem to have a decent eye for defensive talent.
These users gave a High Five to the author DrDUne for the post (total 4):
Roll Tide Raider, BoKnows81, pfish57, Opoponax50
Top
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 577 times
Received High Fives: 645 times

Unread post by Viper »

MexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:48 pm Surprised EMcW & Pregnon are still on the board.
Gone
Top
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

ELCAraiderfan wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:39 pm The draft in Pittsburg looks boring as f[raiders_icon]ck. But the entertainment in here from keyboard wannabe nfl gm's is damn funny and entertaining.
33 years it will comeback to Pittsburgh and all those bored to tears now, will be replaced with a new group of first timers.
Top
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:45 pm Lots and lots of good wr.left, good guards left too,cb
Why do we need a 3rd+ round WR, when we have 2 second year players working on their game the same way any WR from here on out would be doing? Or are we short on WR's on the roster?
Top
User avatar
BG3428
Posts: 1,328
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 11:40 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by BG3428 »

TEs coming off the board with a lot of talent still there. Pretty interesting.
Top
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,408
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 857 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

raidersince63 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:42 pm Yup...after only 2 picks, our draft and our season and our future is doomed. SMH.
No one's saying that. It's very reasonable to say there were better players on the board that could've potentially filled a bigger need. We've seen our trenches get pushed around for years now and there was a legit DT for the taking. That's not doomsaying. It's a reasonable opinion.
These users gave a High Five to the author Opoponax50 for the post (total 5):
pfish57, Roll Tide Raider, Rabidraider, BoKnows81, Deejgoettel
Top
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

Holy crap, Haulcy still on the board too. I'm hoping Raiders can somehow get Big Citrus & Hurst.

double dip at DT with G. Halten or T. Onyedim.

Also like WRs Branch & Burks. I like Burks a little more.

LB K. Louis or Hill JR would be a good pick as well. I like Louis a good bit more
These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post:
Viper
Top
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

MexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:56 pm Holy crap, Haulcy still on the board too. I'm hoping Raiders can somehow get Big Citrus & Hurst.

double dip at DT with G. Halten or T. Onyedim.

Also like WRs Branch & Burks. I like Burks a little more.

LB K. Louis or Hill JR would be a good pick as well. I like Louis a good bit more
Chiefs probably go Branch, as you know he's small but explosive.
Top
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Opoponax50 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:56 pm No one's saying that. It's very reasonable to say there were better players on the board that could've potentially filled a bigger need. We've seen our trenches get pushed around for years now and there was a legit DT for the taking. That's not doomsaying. It's a reasonable opinion.
It wasn't the "reasonable opinions" that I was responding to.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The OG Raider Room”