2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
- Xramfan
- Posts: 17,923
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
- Has given High Fives: 682 times
- Received High Fives: 1279 times
2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
Who do we want?
Discuss
Discuss
- These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1381 times
- Received High Fives: 774 times
Grab the DT in the 2nd and find a way to grab Dunker in the 3rd. Even if they need to burn a 4th to do it.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
- BoJacksonRules
- BoKnows81
- Posts: 6,999
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 963 times
- Received High Fives: 2276 times
Then trade back into the 3rd and grab Skyler Bell and I'd consider that an A+ Day 2.Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:01 am Grab the DT in the 2nd and find a way to grab Dunker in the 3rd. Even if they need to burn a 4th to do it.
- These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
- Rabidraider
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
Oh I agree but we do need a guy or two who will be third string. I would love a guy who has some experience there at a couple positions so you can pencil in a guy here or there. Day three you aren't going to find a ton of guys who are starter level.BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:00 am Realistically, we have depth on the O line. We need starters.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
I didnt watch them much and I know pff grades are just one piece of data but why was Bisontis so poorly graded?
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,264
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 511 times
- Received High Fives: 468 times
I agree. A solid run game can mask WR1.Rick In Bakersfield wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:51 am If Pregnon is there for the pick - I think we take him.
Our offensive line sucked last season.
We need to protect our QBs and give Jeanty a chance to run.
Once we can protect our QB - then draft for some weapons like a WR
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,264
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 511 times
- Received High Fives: 468 times
Where agree he missed a year but it was an ACL. Almost always a repaired ACL is better than your original as they screw a new ligament in.Hellbound wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:01 am Nope to anyone in the 2nd that's coming off of a knee injury, may or may not need another surgery on the knee and hasn't played in a year
So that doesn't worry me.
- MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 393 times
- Received High Fives: 169 times
I really think Bills are gonna take McDonald. I think 9ers will be stupid &, take WR Boston over their way bigger needs at oline &, edge rusher. Which takes the other player Bills could take instead of DT. Cause Bills sorely need good WRs for Allen.
9ers, Cards, Bills all need OL bad. But I don't think they're gonna go that route.
9ers, Cards, Bills all need OL bad. But I don't think they're gonna go that route.
- Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1381 times
- Received High Fives: 774 times
I don't know if penalties affect a grade but I read he is a penalty machine.DanKD wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:05 am I didnt watch them much and I know pff grades are just one piece of data but why was Bisontis so poorly graded?
- Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1381 times
- Received High Fives: 774 times
MexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:12 am I really think Bills are gonna take McDonald. I think 9ers will be stupid &, take WR Boston over their way bigger needs at oline &, edge rusher. Which takes the other player Bills could take instead of DT. Cause Bills sorely need good WRs for Allen.
9ers, Cards, Bills all need OL bad. But I don't think they're gonna go that route.
I agree. We should just grab Hunter if that is the case. Might even be able to do a short drop down and still get him.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
- MexicanHulk
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
I really like Boston for Mendoza. Big, great hands, good after the catch, highest graded against man coverage. Weakness if not great speed but Mendozas accuracy would do well with him i think. The advantage to taking a receiver this year is having hin ready to rock with Mendoza starting 2027
- These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 3):
- MexicanHulk, raidersince63, RickRyb
- MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 393 times
- Received High Fives: 169 times
I like Hunter too but, I've dropped him a bit on my board. I have Miller as the better pick by a big margin. If Hunter is the target, I hope they trade down & take him around 60. That should easily net you another 3rd.Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:16 am I agree. We should just grab Hunter if that is the case. Might even be able to do a short drop down and still get him.
- These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post:
- Raider4Ever
- Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1381 times
- Received High Fives: 774 times
60 seems too low to me. More like somewhere in the 40s.MexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:22 am I like Hunter too but, I've dropped him a bit on my board. I have Miller as the better pick by a big margin. If Hunter is the target, I hope they trade down & take him around 60. That should easily net you another 3rd.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
- MexicanHulk
- MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 393 times
- Received High Fives: 169 times
You could be right but, I've also seen lots of boards who have him in 70's. I've seen a lot more 70's (even a couple 80's) than top 40. So I'm thinking he may actually go 55-65.
- KillerRaider30
- Posts: 7,264
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 511 times
- Received High Fives: 468 times
BisontisDanKD wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:05 am I didnt watch them much and I know pff grades are just one piece of data but why was Bisontis so poorly graded?
Pregnon
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,584
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1483 times
- Received High Fives: 1350 times
100% with you, but it’s why I think we should McDonald/Miller in the 2nd and Sarratt in the 3rd.DanKD wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:21 am I really like Boston for Mendoza. Big, great hands, good after the catch, highest graded against man coverage. Weakness if not great speed but Mendozas accuracy would do well with him i think. The advantage to taking a receiver this year is having hin ready to rock with Mendoza starting 2027
- These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
- raidersince63