2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Choose a second rounder

Poll ended at Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:19 am

CB: McCoy
1
2%
CB: Terrell
0
No votes
DT: McDonald
32
48%
DT: Miller
3
5%
OL: Pregnon
11
17%
OL: Bisontis
3
5%
WR: Boston
9
14%
WR: Bernard
0
No votes
MISC: Other
7
11%
Total votes: 66

User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Unread post by Xramfan »

Who do we want?

Discuss
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Grab the DT in the 2nd and find a way to grab Dunker in the 3rd. Even if they need to burn a 4th to do it.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
BoJacksonRules
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:01 am Grab the DT in the 2nd and find a way to grab Dunker in the 3rd. Even if they need to burn a 4th to do it.
Then trade back into the 3rd and grab Skyler Bell and I'd consider that an A+ Day 2.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:00 am Realistically, we have depth on the O line. We need starters.
Oh I agree but we do need a guy or two who will be third string. I would love a guy who has some experience there at a couple positions so you can pencil in a guy here or there. Day three you aren't going to find a ton of guys who are starter level.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

I didnt watch them much and I know pff grades are just one piece of data but why was Bisontis so poorly graded?
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,264
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 511 times
Received High Fives: 468 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

Rick In Bakersfield wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:51 am If Pregnon is there for the pick - I think we take him.

Our offensive line sucked last season.

We need to protect our QBs and give Jeanty a chance to run.

Once we can protect our QB - then draft for some weapons like a WR
I agree. A solid run game can mask WR1.
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,264
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 511 times
Received High Fives: 468 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

Hellbound wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:01 am Nope to anyone in the 2nd that's coming off of a knee injury, may or may not need another surgery on the knee and hasn't played in a year
Where agree he missed a year but it was an ACL. Almost always a repaired ACL is better than your original as they screw a new ligament in.
So that doesn't worry me.
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

I really think Bills are gonna take McDonald. I think 9ers will be stupid &, take WR Boston over their way bigger needs at oline &, edge rusher. Which takes the other player Bills could take instead of DT. Cause Bills sorely need good WRs for Allen.

9ers, Cards, Bills all need OL bad. But I don't think they're gonna go that route.
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

DanKD wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:05 am I didnt watch them much and I know pff grades are just one piece of data but why was Bisontis so poorly graded?
I don't know if penalties affect a grade but I read he is a penalty machine.
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

MexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:12 am I really think Bills are gonna take McDonald. I think 9ers will be stupid &, take WR Boston over their way bigger needs at oline &, edge rusher. Which takes the other player Bills could take instead of DT. Cause Bills sorely need good WRs for Allen.

9ers, Cards, Bills all need OL bad. But I don't think they're gonna go that route.

I agree. We should just grab Hunter if that is the case. Might even be able to do a short drop down and still get him.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

I really like Boston for Mendoza. Big, great hands, good after the catch, highest graded against man coverage. Weakness if not great speed but Mendozas accuracy would do well with him i think. The advantage to taking a receiver this year is having hin ready to rock with Mendoza starting 2027
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post (total 3):
MexicanHulk, raidersince63, RickRyb
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:16 am I agree. We should just grab Hunter if that is the case. Might even be able to do a short drop down and still get him.
I like Hunter too but, I've dropped him a bit on my board. I have Miller as the better pick by a big margin. If Hunter is the target, I hope they trade down & take him around 60. That should easily net you another 3rd.
These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post:
Raider4Ever
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

MexicanHulk wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:22 am I like Hunter too but, I've dropped him a bit on my board. I have Miller as the better pick by a big margin. If Hunter is the target, I hope they trade down & take him around 60. That should easily net you another 3rd.
60 seems too low to me. More like somewhere in the 40s.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:24 am 60 seems too low to me. More like somewhere in the 40s.
You could be right but, I've also seen lots of boards who have him in 70's. I've seen a lot more 70's (even a couple 80's) than top 40. So I'm thinking he may actually go 55-65.
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,264
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 511 times
Received High Fives: 468 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

DanKD wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:05 am I didnt watch them much and I know pff grades are just one piece of data but why was Bisontis so poorly graded?
Bisontis


Pregnon
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

DanKD wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:21 am I really like Boston for Mendoza. Big, great hands, good after the catch, highest graded against man coverage. Weakness if not great speed but Mendozas accuracy would do well with him i think. The advantage to taking a receiver this year is having hin ready to rock with Mendoza starting 2027
100% with you, but it’s why I think we should McDonald/Miller in the 2nd and Sarratt in the 3rd.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
raidersince63
Post Reply