Inside Grudens 2nd regime

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Inside Grudens 2nd regime

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Since we have two weeks to the draft, here's something spicy to talk about-- A detailed article in the Athletic via NY Times that just confirms what most already suspected..Good read on Grudens 2nd go around with the Raiders..The reddit version gets you past the paywall..

https://www.reddit.com/r/raiders/s/IznwwLXEZH
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
Oaktown Superman
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,377
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 522 times
Received High Fives: 569 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

DanKD wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:22 am I'd argue the league did us a favor. Screwed gruden sure but it got us rid of Gruden and Carr. Without that I'm not sure Brady agrees to become part owner and we sign gruden to a new 10 year extension after his breakout 8-9 season
I'd argue removing a head coach of a competitive team mid season has disastrous consequences, the ripple effects of which can last for years. I didn't want Gruden 2.0 but I think some folks say ridiculous shit because they want to pound their chest and say they were right. The NFL tanking that season for the Raiders, and the suggestion that it was a good thing, qualifies as ridiculous shit.
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

NoThanksSir wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:34 am I'd argue removing a head coach of a competitive team mid season has disastrous consequences, the ripple effects of which can last for years. I didn't want Gruden 2.0 but I think some folks say ridiculous shit because they want to pound their chest and say they were right. The NFL tanking that season for the Raiders, and the suggestion that it was a good thing, qualifies as ridiculous shit.
I agree that removing a head coach over a controversial series of events is not a good thing. I would further argue that until the court case is in session that we still do not know who leaked the emails. So until we know that, the person who tanked our season is also unknown. Hackers hack email servers all the time. I want the answer before I push the blame. Gruden will get his chance to make his case. I hope by then we are a playoff team and Davis keeps his f[raiders_icon]cking hand out of the cookie jar and let's the adults do their jobs.
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,513
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 904 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by Willmark »

NoThanksSir wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:34 am I'd argue removing a head coach of a competitive team mid season has disastrous consequences, the ripple effects of which can last for years. I didn't want Gruden 2.0 but I think some folks say ridiculous shit because they want to pound their chest and say they were right. The NFL tanking that season for the Raiders, and the suggestion that it was a good thing, qualifies as ridiculous shit.
I could be mistaken but I believe his take is a bit more nuanced that that.

Basically he’s saying if I read it right: in the long run we ended up better off where we are now.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Attyla wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:28 am Again, I don't owe you a damn thing. And I don't watch money, I watch football. Your just a bit too obtuse for me to waste any more time on you.
why do you keep saying "i dont owe you a damn thing" nobody ever said anything about owing anything ???

ps you cannot separate money and football "its a business first " you need money to hire scouts/coaches, you need money to sign free agents and draft picks, everything about the game of football works because of having money
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post (total 2):
Goodtimes333, FlyBono24
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Attyla wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:28 am Again, I don't owe you a damn thing. And I don't watch money, I watch football. Your just a bit too obtuse for me to waste any more time on you.
obtuse?? Are you the Shawshank warden? :zany:
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post:
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

The fact that they had two separate draft boards is wild, Gruden and the coaches on one side, Mayock and the scouts on the other. Sources saying Gruden wasn’t even around on Day 3 pretty much confirm that Mayock was behind picks like Maxx, Hunter Renfrow, and Nate Hobbs.

Mayock was clearly a strong talent evaluator, his issue wasn’t scouting, it was running the front office, according to sources.

Then you’ve got Gruden’s “kill tapes,” where he’d cut together negative plays to discredit prospects the scouts liked. He also gave Tom Cable heavy influence, which led to picks like Alex Leatherwood.

And per sources they panicked and botched the first-round trade-down and still ended up taking Clelin Ferrell.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
rhumbob
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Willmark wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:53 am I could be mistaken but I believe his take is a bit more nuanced that that.

Basically he’s saying if I read it right: in the long run we ended up better off where we are now.
Yes. Long term, the franchise needed to move on from Gruden to have any shot at sustained success. This expedited things and certainly led to some disastrous seasons to follow but we are hopefully finally on the right track now.

No team with Gruden making roster decisions will have any amount of sustained success. Gruden was largely responsible for the team being so bad for the next couple years following his release. He is actually a good motivator which has the actual talent of the team overachieving but we were so barren of talent all along the roster due to Gruden.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
Willmark
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Rabidraider wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:04 pm obtuse?? Are you the Shawshank warden? :zany:
I prefer the Family Guy version

Image
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post (total 2):
FLORIDARAYDAH, Rabidraider
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Summerall, “Good evening, everyone. From a packed Allegiant Stadium tonight, we bring you a matchup unlike any other, the Coins against the Cash. Two teams, two styles, one game that promises to be unforgettable.”

Madden, “Yeah, and you look at these two teams, Pat, it’s like watching two different kinds of money fight it out. The Coins, they’re tough, they’re durable, they’ve been around forever. You drop ‘em, they make noise, they get noticed. And then you’ve got the Cash, smooth, fast, they can fold, they can stack, they can move through defenses like paper through a wallet!”

Summerall, “Both sides have their strengths. The Coins rely on grit and grind, while the Cash bring speed and finesse. It’s tradition versus flexibility, and tonight we’ll see which one comes out on top.”

Madden, “And here’s the thing, Pat, when you put these two together, you don’t just get a football game, you get a financial rumble! It’s clink versus crinkle, jingling versus folding, and I can’t wait to see who’s left standing when the final whistle blows.”

Summerall, “Kickoff is moments away. Stay with us, Coins versus Cash, coming up next.”

Image
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 1:59 pm thats the entire problem with your responses ...nobody is talking about mark cashing in or not, the responses were franchise related in other words raider related ...your the one making it mark davis related (personal) !!!! going from last (poorest) to 3rd helps the raiders in all facets including football related, you need money to sign good quality coaches,free agents and draft picks

ps here you go again with personal attacks again (crayons comment) you just cant help it, can you
Here is the team’s value vs. the product on the field, i.e., the football team.

2011, $761M, 8–8
2012, $785M, 4–12
2013, $825M, 4–12
2014, $1.0B, 3–13
2015, $1.43B, 7–9
2016, $2.1B, 12–4 (Oakland Coliseum)
2017, $2.4B, 6–10
2018, $2.9B, 4–12
2019, $3.0B, 7–9
2020, $3.1B, 8–8
2021, $3.4B, 10–7
2022, $5.1B, 6–11
2023, $6.2B, 8–9
2024, $6.7B, 4–13
2025, $7.7B, 3–14

There are owners with a worse winning percentage. Two of them. David Tepper, .310, bought the Panthers for 2.275B, the Panthers are now valued at 5.9B. Jimmy Haslam, .333, bought the Browns 987M, now worth 4.6B. For curiosity’s sake, the Cowboys who are the NFL’s highest valued franchise at 13B, won their last Super Bowl while valued at 272M.

An NFL team’s value rising is an inevitability. In fact, no NFL team has lost value in the modern era (since 1970). As you can also see, a team’s value has no correlation whatsoever with the product on the field, the football team, wins and losses, which in my opinion as a football fan are the important parts of my relationship with a football team.

I am not without hope though…
User avatar
rhumbob
Posts: 640
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 7:47 am
Location: Cincinnati
Has given High Fives: 483 times
Received High Fives: 88 times

Unread post by rhumbob »

Gruden was a good coach and a bad GM. It was obvious after Tampa Bay. Crazy that Mark Davis couldn't see that and put guardrails in place. Too much with kill tapes and two draft boards. Damn.

Hopefully we're on to better days.
These users gave a High Five to the author rhumbob for the post (total 2):
NoThanksSir, Sir Raider Duck, OMS
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 18,901
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 353 times
Received High Fives: 236 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

DanKD wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:22 am I'd argue the league did us a favor. Screwed gruden sure but it got us rid of Gruden and Carr. Without that I'm not sure Brady agrees to become part owner and we sign gruden to a new 10 year extension after his breakout 8-9 season
That's a bingo
User avatar
16 to 88
Posts: 18,901
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
Location: Dog House
Has given High Fives: 353 times
Received High Fives: 236 times

Unread post by 16 to 88 »

DanKD wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:12 pm Yes. Long term, the franchise needed to move on from Gruden to have any shot at sustained success. This expedited things and certainly led to some disastrous seasons to follow but we are hopefully finally on the right track now.

No team with Gruden making roster decisions will have any amount of sustained success. Gruden was largely responsible for the team being so bad for the next couple years following his release. He is actually a good motivator which has the actual talent of the team overachieving but we were so barren of talent all along the roster due to Gruden.
Overbearing swaggering tin plated dictator with delusions of god hood.
These users gave a High Five to the author 16 to 88 for the post (total 2):
rhumbob, GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

16 to 88 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 4:50 pm Overbearing swaggering tin plated dictator with delusions of god hood.
hey, I am not swaggering
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Hellbound
Posts: 6,432
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 549 times
Received High Fives: 808 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 2:25 pm Summerall, “Good evening, everyone. From a packed Allegiant Stadium tonight, we bring you a matchup unlike any other, the Coins against the Cash. Two teams, two styles, one game that promises to be unforgettable.”

Madden, “Yeah, and you look at these two teams, Pat, it’s like watching two different kinds of money fight it out. The Coins, they’re tough, they’re durable, they’ve been around forever. You drop ‘em, they make noise, they get noticed. And then you’ve got the Cash, smooth, fast, they can fold, they can stack, they can move through defenses like paper through a wallet!”

Summerall, “Both sides have their strengths. The Coins rely on grit and grind, while the Cash bring speed and finesse. It’s tradition versus flexibility, and tonight we’ll see which one comes out on top.”

Madden, “And here’s the thing, Pat, when you put these two together, you don’t just get a football game, you get a financial rumble! It’s clink versus crinkle, jingling versus folding, and I can’t wait to see who’s left standing when the final whistle blows.”

Summerall, “Kickoff is moments away. Stay with us, Coins versus Cash, coming up next.”

Image
Damn...I read that in both of their voices too
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
Post Reply