2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
- Xramfan
- Posts: 17,923
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
- Has given High Fives: 682 times
- Received High Fives: 1279 times
2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
Who do we want?
Discuss
Discuss
- These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
koonce last yr minus burst and bend, not sure he will ever be the same againraiders72 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:00 pm After Crosby who is a legit Pass rusher? Nobody
Koonce injury
Wilson bust
Paye run stuffer
Snowden jury is out
wilson bust, will move inside due to strength
paye run stuffer with 6 to 7 sacks per yr
snowden has some upside
max stud
crawford insurance and has upside
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
Crawford was 67-75 overall on Mcshay, Kiper and Jeremiah boards. Hes not a reach at all. May not be the guy we wanted or knew but not a reach.
- Viper
- Posts: 1,549
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
- Has given High Fives: 577 times
- Received High Fives: 645 times
You put together sentences pretty good for being drunkGoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:57 pm Could be the alcohol, but I haven’t found anything shocking about our draft. Sure I’m assuming they know what the f[raiders_icon]ck they’re doing. At the end of the day, they’re getting paid for doing what my ego makes me think I can do. I’ve unfortunately never received a red cent for all the offseason work I’ve put into this draft.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 2):
- GoodTimeCharlie, Steve007
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
I don't think they've made a final decision on Rodgers yet, have they?
- BoJacksonRules
- Posts: 2,659
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
- Has given High Fives: 360 times
- Received High Fives: 203 times
Agreed, reminds me of of how Day 2 turned out last yearBoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:04 pm Not knocking the player at all. In my opinion, we gave up a blue chip player in McDonald for a DB and then with the pick at got from the trade, draft a special teams/ edge rusher with the almighty "potential" designation.
- These users gave a High Five to the author BoJacksonRules for the post:
- BoKnows81
- raider_kin
- Posts: 3,663
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2132 times
- Received High Fives: 908 times
Stukes was picked 5-8 picks early, maybe. Also drafted later than some mocks had him. At a position of dire need and thin in the draft.vtraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:57 pm Stukes was a good pick. Maybe a little early but not by much and a position of dire need. Crawford definitely wouldn't have been my first choice. I understand the thought. But wouldn't have went for that position myself. But he was picked right around where he should have been
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
naw, i disagree day 2 has been a c so far, liked the stukes pick (need) crawford is for the futureBoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:54 pm Don't y'all get tired of justifying bad picks? I mean really. It never works out for you guys. This team is bombing Day 2 so far. One more pick to make it right.
- Rabidraider
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1381 times
- Received High Fives: 774 times
They want him, but he's on a mushroom retreat. He hasn't told them yet.raidersince63 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:06 pm I don't think they've made a final decision on the old guy yet, have they?
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,584
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1483 times
- Received High Fives: 1350 times
Only been playing organized football for 5 year. Has a basketball background. Half-full, he’s improved year over year. (Crawford)raiders72 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:02 pm Stukes can play
Crawford is puzzling
Again, end of day after round 3 it’s a shot in dark
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
I wonder if Pregnon got something flagged in his medical we arent aware of.
- CWood24
- Posts: 3,970
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
- Has given High Fives: 15 times
- Received High Fives: 365 times
Scratch that Pregnon isn't dropping like a stone or a brick anymore, he is dropping like some of our fans off the nearest bridge after our next pick
- These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
- raidersince63
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
stukes was maybe 2-3 picks early but when filling a need you go get your guy ...plus the trade down got us another 3rd ...id say it was a win for usraider_kin wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:07 pm Stukes was picked 5-8 picks early, maybe. Also drafted later than some mocks had him. At a position of dire need and thin in the draft.
- These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
- raider_kin
- MexicanHulk
- Posts: 2,078
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
- Location: San Francisco
- Has given High Fives: 393 times
- Received High Fives: 169 times
Yeah, there's absolutely logic to the Crawford pick &, he wasn't a reach. He was ranked around that area. This is the team making a pick a year early. He gets experience coached up, then ready for full time starter next year. Since Koonce may move on. & if they don't see Paye as much of a pass rusher, then, Crawford was needed.
I myself didn't like the pick too much because I had a handful of players I wanted over him, at positions that were more need this year. So don't get me wrong, Crawford looks like a solid prospect.
I myself didn't like the pick too much because I had a handful of players I wanted over him, at positions that were more need this year. So don't get me wrong, Crawford looks like a solid prospect.
- These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 6):
- mstrbass2000, ALLRAIDERWORLD21, chucker, Goodtimes333, raidersince63, Steve007
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times