2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Choose a second rounder

Poll ended at Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:19 am

CB: McCoy
1
2%
CB: Terrell
0
No votes
DT: McDonald
32
48%
DT: Miller
3
5%
OL: Pregnon
11
17%
OL: Bisontis
3
5%
WR: Boston
9
14%
WR: Bernard
0
No votes
MISC: Other
7
11%
Total votes: 66

User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Post by Xramfan »

Who do we want?

Discuss
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

raiders72 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:00 pm After Crosby who is a legit Pass rusher? Nobody
Koonce injury
Wilson bust
Paye run stuffer
Snowden jury is out
koonce last yr minus burst and bend, not sure he will ever be the same again
wilson bust, will move inside due to strength
paye run stuffer with 6 to 7 sacks per yr
snowden has some upside
max stud
crawford insurance and has upside
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Crawford was 67-75 overall on Mcshay, Kiper and Jeremiah boards. Hes not a reach at all. May not be the guy we wanted or knew but not a reach.
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 577 times
Received High Fives: 645 times

Unread post by Viper »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:57 pm Could be the alcohol, but I haven’t found anything shocking about our draft. Sure I’m assuming they know what the f[raiders_icon]ck they’re doing. At the end of the day, they’re getting paid for doing what my ego makes me think I can do. I’ve unfortunately never received a red cent for all the offseason work I’ve put into this draft.
You put together sentences pretty good for being drunk
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 2):
GoodTimeCharlie, Steve007
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:58 pm Pittsburgh drafts another QB...


Rinse and repeat...
I don't think they've made a final decision on Rodgers yet, have they?
User avatar
BoJacksonRules
Posts: 2,659
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
Has given High Fives: 360 times
Received High Fives: 203 times

Unread post by BoJacksonRules »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:04 pm Not knocking the player at all. In my opinion, we gave up a blue chip player in McDonald for a DB and then with the pick at got from the trade, draft a special teams/ edge rusher with the almighty "potential" designation.
Agreed, reminds me of of how Day 2 turned out last year
These users gave a High Five to the author BoJacksonRules for the post:
BoKnows81
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

vtraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:57 pm Stukes was a good pick. Maybe a little early but not by much and a position of dire need. Crawford definitely wouldn't have been my first choice. I understand the thought. But wouldn't have went for that position myself. But he was picked right around where he should have been
Stukes was picked 5-8 picks early, maybe. Also drafted later than some mocks had him. At a position of dire need and thin in the draft.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:54 pm Don't y'all get tired of justifying bad picks? I mean really. It never works out for you guys. This team is bombing Day 2 so far. One more pick to make it right.
naw, i disagree day 2 has been a c so far, liked the stukes pick (need) crawford is for the future
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 994
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 370 times
Received High Fives: 277 times

Unread post by rcraider »

Run on receivers now
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

raidersince63 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:06 pm I don't think they've made a final decision on the old guy yet, have they?
They want him, but he's on a mushroom retreat. He hasn't told them yet.
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

raiders72 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:02 pm Stukes can play
Crawford is puzzling
Again, end of day after round 3 it’s a shot in dark
Only been playing organized football for 5 year. Has a basketball background. Half-full, he’s improved year over year. (Crawford)
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

I wonder if Pregnon got something flagged in his medical we arent aware of.
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

Scratch that Pregnon isn't dropping like a stone or a brick anymore, he is dropping like some of our fans off the nearest bridge after our next pick
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

raider_kin wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:07 pm Stukes was picked 5-8 picks early, maybe. Also drafted later than some mocks had him. At a position of dire need and thin in the draft.
stukes was maybe 2-3 picks early but when filling a need you go get your guy ...plus the trade down got us another 3rd ...id say it was a win for us
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
raider_kin
User avatar
MexicanHulk
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:00 pm
Location: San Francisco
Has given High Fives: 393 times
Received High Fives: 169 times

Unread post by MexicanHulk »

Yeah, there's absolutely logic to the Crawford pick &, he wasn't a reach. He was ranked around that area. This is the team making a pick a year early. He gets experience coached up, then ready for full time starter next year. Since Koonce may move on. & if they don't see Paye as much of a pass rusher, then, Crawford was needed.

I myself didn't like the pick too much because I had a handful of players I wanted over him, at positions that were more need this year. So don't get me wrong, Crawford looks like a solid prospect.
These users gave a High Five to the author MexicanHulk for the post (total 6):
mstrbass2000, ALLRAIDERWORLD21, chucker, Goodtimes333, raidersince63, Steve007
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Double post
Post Reply