2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
- Xramfan
- Posts: 17,923
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
- Has given High Fives: 682 times
- Received High Fives: 1279 times
2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm
Who do we want?
Discuss
Discuss
- These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- BotesBoats
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 45 times
- Received High Fives: 99 times
A late rounder. 5th or 6th most likelyBoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:58 am 49ers reportedly very open to trading back from 33. What's cost to move up 4 spots in the 2nd? A 4th and the 60 yard FG should do it.
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
to trade up to 33 you would give away our top 4th and a fifth on the charts but no way teams do that. I would say the best case would be our 2nd and our last 4th.BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:58 am 49ers reportedly very open to trading back from 33. What's cost to move up 4 spots in the 2nd? A 4th and the 60 yard FG should do it.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
- BoJacksonRules
- RunOverByHubbard
- Posts: 13,103
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
- Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
- Has given High Fives: 106 times
- Received High Fives: 574 times
Looking at the film highlights of Bisontis and Pregnon, I think one is clearly a better prospect (and I know I am working on very little information compared to what scouts do) and it's Pregnon. I don't want to get involved in another Alex Leatherwood situation. He was a decorated lineman for sure, but I remember that a criticism was that he held and frequently. No one could teach him how to be a successful offensive tackle (or guard for that matter) in the NFL. I see Pregnon as ready to go. Bisontis's feet and balance are not elite and his movement in small space is well below Pregnon. Plus Pregnon can be seen adeptly pulling and taking on defenders at the second level. What is not to like with this guy? Put him next to our new center and we might have something there. Next we need a new right OT.
- These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 3):
- Trainnvain, dred, KillerRaider30
- chucker
- Posts: 16,767
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 1823 times
- Received High Fives: 2454 times
I assume that someone just didn't want to have too many threads where the discussion was all the same. As an alternative to starting a new thread, you could just send a PM to the OP with all the poll selections already typed in and then they can just do an edit of their post with a poll creation and a quick copy paste and it's there. Assuming that they don't think your poll is stupid. I did that with XRF's OP in this case, hopefully he isn't too mad about hijacking his post.GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:13 am Yo Mods, why isn’t that poll kosher? Is it because we don’t want to make two Round 2 threads? Wasn’t my intent.
Edit: Just saw the poll got added here. Thanks gents. How do I delete the locked one?
If you just go to your thread and delete your post, it deletes the thread.
- These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- BotesBoats
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 45 times
- Received High Fives: 99 times
Yea, that's too muchAttyla wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:08 am to trade up to 33 you would give away our top 4th and a fifth on the charts but no way teams do that. I would say the best case would be our 2nd and our last 4th.
The charts says that's a 580 value and 540 value, 40 points being around a top of the round 5th pick
The Jets traded up 3 spots from 33 to 30 and only gave up a 6th.
Patriots traded up from 28 to 31 and gave up a bottom of the 4th round pick.
I think our 5th would do it unless there is competition, then maybe we'd have to give up our bottom of the 4th pick only.
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
Not sure we can use the chart alone, it does come down to competition as well. The charts are handy tools but they only go for so much.BotesBoats wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:18 am Yea, that's too much
The charts says that's a 580 value and 540 value, 40 points being around a top of the round 5th pick
The Jets traded up 3 spots from 33 to 30 and only gave up a 6th.
Patriots traded up from 28 to 31 and gave up a bottom of the 4th round pick.
I think our 5th would do it unless there is competition, then maybe we'd have to give up our bottom of the 4th pick only.
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,310
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 464 times
- Received High Fives: 1033 times
No need to trade up, we can get a starter with where we are picking. WR/G/DT/S in any order is what I’m hoping for.
- These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
- raidersince63
- Raider_Dave
- Posts: 3,445
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:22 pm
- Has given High Fives: 4 times
- Received High Fives: 191 times
As a UVA fan, Malachi Fields was always a disappointmentRaider4Ever wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:15 am If no Boston at 36, which I don't think we'll take him there, then maybe Ja'Kobi Lane or Malachi Fields in subsequent rounds. Both are X-type WRs that can be had later on.
- Southshield
- Posts: 2,467
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:52 am
- Location: Concord, CA
- Has given High Fives: 69 times
- Received High Fives: 119 times
hearing way too much chatter about Stukes as the 2nd round pick for my liking.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Southshield for the post:
- Gmac
- SkullCrusher
- Posts: 11,567
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
- Location: The Nation.
- Has given High Fives: 409 times
- Received High Fives: 466 times
DT/OL perhaps secondary. Not feeling WR and Boston, we have two second year WR's that are still working there way into the NFL.
I'm still going to favor OL. We need as many swings at getting this right as possible.
I'm still going to favor OL. We need as many swings at getting this right as possible.
- These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
- RunOverByHubbard
- mstrbass2000
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
- Has given High Fives: 337 times
- Received High Fives: 364 times
Can a swap of 4th rd picks do the deal? Our top of the 4th for their 4th...seems like the Niners are begging to trade out.
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
That would piss me off, especially after I drank deep and fully of the KooladeSouthshield wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:29 am hearing way too much chatter about Stukes as the 2nd round pick for my liking.
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,122
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 968 times
- Received High Fives: 535 times
There is always value trading for a veteran when you have the picks and cap space. There are some players who can be had. I would love to get Christian Barmore (talk over here on sports radio that he could be moved for a mid round pick). There are others as well.
- These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post:
- raidersince63
- Oaktown Superman
- Posts: 3,019
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 621 times
- Received High Fives: 252 times
McDonald is preferred by most in here so youse nose that’s the kiss of death.
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,584
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1483 times
- Received High Fives: 1350 times
It was, definitely. Then again, chance we just drafted the next Tom Brady. Maybe it finally changed brothers.Oaktown Superman wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:02 pm McDonald is preferred by most in here so youse nose that’s the kiss of death.