Jakobi Meyers Trade Rumors

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Raider727
Posts: 5,823
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
Location: Somewhere drinking tangy 🍊
Has given High Fives: 37 times
Received High Fives: 176 times

Jakobi Meyers Trade Rumors

Post by Raider727 »



User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Post by Jeevo »

raider_kin wrote: Thu Oct 16, 2025 1:33 pm Thanks Jeevo. Apologies if you are our capologist.
I am not the cap guy, that’s definitely Chucker.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 2):
rich72, raider_kin
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Post by Attyla »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Thu Oct 16, 2025 4:37 pm Man please.

I'm not here for a philosophy class. Forget the sentence structure. We're talking football, specifically about whether receivers can actually get open.
The whole context we were operating under was that Meyers needs a perfect, tight-window throw just to even get a target in the first place.
You're pretending that established context doesn't exist just to make my argument sound weak. That's not the debate. It’s you reaching and reaching HARD I might add.
you keep insisting I have to figure out the context of your bullshit statement. I do not.
User avatar
RenoRaiders75
Posts: 1,370
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 8:36 am
Received High Fives: 35 times

Post by RenoRaiders75 »

I had a crush on a girl in high school named Chaz. I guess that is a unisex name
These users gave a High Five to the author RenoRaiders75 for the post:
dred
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Post by raider_kin »

RenoRaiders75 wrote: Fri Oct 17, 2025 5:43 am I had a crush on a girl in high school named Chaz. I guess that is a unisex name
I love the name Alex for a girl. I know its short for Alexandria, but still cool...
User avatar
NoClapsPlease
Posts: 9,439
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:11 pm
Has given High Fives: 33 times
Received High Fives: 186 times

Post by NoClapsPlease »

Attyla wrote: Fri Oct 17, 2025 4:28 am you keep insisting I have to figure out the context of your bullshit statement. I do not.
Well given that my response was to someone else, I don’t owe you an explanation. Several folks in here understood what was said - you’re just deliberately being obtuse and disingenuous.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoClapsPlease for the post:
The Real CK
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Post by Attyla »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 12:00 pm Well given that my response was to someone else, I don’t owe you an explanation. Several folks in here understood what was said - you’re just deliberately being obtuse and disingenuous.
nope, I looked at a stand alone statement and destroyed it. But you feel free to stand by a statement that is a joke.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 12:03 pm nope, I looked at a stand alone statement and destroyed it. But you feel free to stand by a statement that is a joke.
Dude just keeps making himself look more foolish with each post.
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 12:20 pm Dude just keeps making himself look more foolish with each post.
it just seems to me that if you said something, you should either own it or refute it. I mean, who gives one f[raiders_icon]ck who you quoted before you make a statement. Are you saying that what you said is not true to you? If so, that becomes a lie. If you think what you said is true, support it. Seems simple to me. But blaming the quality of the receiver for the pass does not make sense to me. That is why conditional/conclusion statements are interesting. You put up a condition and draw a conclusion based on the condition.
User avatar
Raider727
Posts: 5,823
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
Location: Somewhere drinking tangy 🍊
Has given High Fives: 37 times
Received High Fives: 176 times

Post by Raider727 »

User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Post by BoKnows81 »

Raider727 wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 2:52 pm
Defensive lineman and corners? This staff is absolutely oblivious to our O line situation.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
NoClapsPlease
Posts: 9,439
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:11 pm
Has given High Fives: 33 times
Received High Fives: 186 times

Post by NoClapsPlease »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 12:20 pm Dude just keeps making himself look more foolish with each post.
I can confidently state, and I declare that no context is needed for this statement, that I do not care how I ‘look’ to you [fact]. You’re pretty irrelevant on these forums [opinion].

Hope that brings the clarity needed for everyone [optimistic].
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Post by BoKnows81 »

NoClapsPlease wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 3:10 pm I can confidently state, and I declare that no context is needed for this statement, that I do not care how I ‘look’ to you [fact]. You’re pretty irrelevant on these forums [opinion].

Hope that brings the clarity needed for everyone [optimistic].
Lol. Typical response from a troll that knows he's wrong.
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 3:14 pm Lol. Typical response from a troll that knows he's wrong.
so does he believe his stand alone statement or not. Are there caveats to his statement that requires context and has he ever made clear what that caveat is? And most importantly, is any caveat going to make his bullshit statement make his statement even remotely true? And why is he fighting the notion that his stand alone statement needs context given it is a bullshit statement to begin with?

Bullshit is bullshit no matter how indignant someone gets.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Oct 18, 2025 3:30 pm so does he believe his stand alone statement or not. Are there caveats to his statement that requires context and has he ever made clear what that caveat is? And most importantly, is any caveat going to make his bullshit statement make his statement even remotely true? And why is he fighting the notion that his stand alone statement needs context given it is a bullshit statement to begin with?

Bullshit is bullshit no matter how indignant someone gets.
I gotta be honest. I don't even think he knows.
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Post by raider_kin »

Go DM guys, this is getting tiresome.
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post (total 4):
FLORIDARAYDAH, RickRyb, STHfrontrow, heavyD
Post Reply