2026 Defense thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
Post Reply
User avatar
STHfrontrow
Posts: 989
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 35 times
Received High Fives: 74 times

2026 Defense thread

Unread post by STHfrontrow »

This defense doesn't have much talent at all especially after the Maxx trade. 1st time Def Coach Rob Leonard really doesn't haven't much to work with but that should change.

Are we leading with Wilson & Chinn?

Figure the Raiders might draft 1 or 2 defensive players within the 4 picks they have in the top of the draft that might be day one starters. Looks like overall though this defense is going to be built through free agency.

Thoughts.
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,488
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 101 times

Unread post by Be_Easy_25 »

It’s a built in excuse for Rob Leonard. Not suggesting Leonard wants an excuse. I’m just suggesting one is naturally built in.


I’m not sure there will be a good way to evaluate him unless he truly turns chicken schitt into chicken salad.

I think I may want another 2nd in this draft so we can add to the defense specifically. This would likely mean moving trading back from 14.
User avatar
raiders72
Posts: 852
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 4:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 1 time
Received High Fives: 73 times

Unread post by raiders72 »

It’s evident right now it’s a rebuild..

Offensively with cap space, build OLine and add a veteran WR or two with no baggage and no veteran divas!

10 picks give or take, I take the Ravens pick and trade down for a lower 1 and another 2 if possible, with 2 second round picks you can trade down again with one since the experts say this is a stacked draft at LB and Edge

Use excess cap money to find the spillanes and stokes
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,425
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 400 times
Received High Fives: 898 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

More than likely all the starters but a few will be backups, well I hope so lol
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,105
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 713 times
Received High Fives: 253 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Defense was bottom tier WITH Crosby. Not much changes.
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

mranquales wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 4:15 am Defense was bottom tier WITH Crosby. Not much changes.
The sad thing is, you really believe that.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

All I know is we need a lot of help. I really don’t want to be relying on Wilson and Koonce.
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »



Send them one of our 4ths
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post (total 2):
NoThanksSir, RI RAIDER
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 4:22 am The sad thing is, you really believe that.
Believe me, dude is annoying af, but hes not wrong here. With our current situation, we can replace Maxx between this year and next year while improving on production.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

raiders72 wrote: Fri Mar 06, 2026 7:53 pm It’s evident right now it’s a rebuild..
Fun with words really, yeah it's a rebuild, what's to reload on the #32 ranked team?
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:19 am Believe me, dude is annoying af, but hes not wrong here. With our current situation, we can replace Maxx between this year and next year while improving on production.
Losing Maxx did not make us better. Blaming him for our record is also things he has said which is flat out stupid. The only hope is that those 2 picks help make us better down the road. I get why we made the move, the offer was good. But in the short term it did not make us better and if we miss with those two picks it will equate to losing Mack.
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:45 am Losing Maxx did not make us better. Blaming him for our record is also things he has said which is flat out stupid. The only hope is that those 2 picks help make us better down the road. I get why we made the move, the offer was good. But in the short term it did not make us better and if we miss with those two picks it will equate to losing Mack.
But it's not going to make us worse. That's the point.
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:48 am But it's not going to make us worse. That's the point.
We don't know that at this point. But logic dictates that taking away your best player does not improve a team. That said, the other moves matter. But our team last year without Maxx would have made us worse. Teams used double teams to keep him at bay and even that did not work. Teams are not double teaming anyone on our defense without Maxx and that is an advantage for an offense.

That all said, the game is a team game, not a player game. Garrett is arguably the best in the game and their team sucked. One player who is great cannot win, with the possible exception of the QB, a game on their own. Garrett had no help like Crosby.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 3):
chucker, Oaktownonly, dred
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 11:00 am We don't know that at this point. But logic dictates that taking away your best player does not improve a team. That said, the other moves matter. But our team last year without Maxx would have made us worse. Teams used double teams to keep him at bay and even that did not work. Teams are not double teaming anyone on our defense without Maxx and that is an advantage for an offense.

That all said, the game is a team game, not a player game. Garrett is arguably the best in the game and their team sucked. One player who is great cannot win, with the possible exception of the QB, a game on their own. Garrett had no help like Crosby.
What's your definition of improving a team? Bc to me, if the Raiders record improves every year starting this year and while Maxx is in Baltimore, which I'd bet my life it does, then we in fact improved our TEAM. And trading Maxx while obtaining the picks in fact accelerates the chance to improve our team.

And honestly if I were the Browns, I'd ship Garrett's ass out bc the haul they would get would send them in the right direction very quickly.
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

BoKnows81 wrote: Sat Mar 07, 2026 11:10 am What's your definition of improving a team? Bc to me, if the Raiders record improves every year starting this year and while Maxx is in Baltimore, which I'd bet my life it does, then we in fact improved our TEAM. And trading Maxx while obtaining the picks in fact accelerates the chance to improve our team.

And honestly if I were the Browns, I'd ship Garrett's ass out bc the haul they would get would send them in the right direction very quickly.
Browns the new raiders. They reworked watsons contract with now huge cap hits next year and year after. They should have gone full rebuild but are trying to win now with crap quarterbacks.
Post Reply