Raiderstation

Who do we want?

Discuss

raiders72 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:00 pm After Crosby who is a legit Pass rusher? Nobody
Koonce injury
Wilson bust
Paye run stuffer
Snowden jury is out

koonce last yr minus burst and bend, not sure he will ever be the same again
wilson bust, will move inside due to strength
paye run stuffer with 6 to 7 sacks per yr
snowden has some upside
max stud
crawford insurance and has upside

Crawford was 67-75 overall on Mcshay, Kiper and Jeremiah boards. Hes not a reach at all. May not be the guy we wanted or knew but not a reach.

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:57 pm Could be the alcohol, but I haven’t found anything shocking about our draft. Sure I’m assuming they know what the f[raiders_icon]ck they’re doing. At the end of the day, they’re getting paid for doing what my ego makes me think I can do. I’ve unfortunately never received a red cent for all the offseason work I’ve put into this draft.

You put together sentences pretty good for being drunk

Rabidraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:58 pm Pittsburgh drafts another QB...


Rinse and repeat...

I don't think they've made a final decision on Rodgers yet, have they?

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:04 pm Not knocking the player at all. In my opinion, we gave up a blue chip player in McDonald for a DB and then with the pick at got from the trade, draft a special teams/ edge rusher with the almighty "potential" designation.

Agreed, reminds me of of how Day 2 turned out last year

vtraider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:57 pm Stukes was a good pick. Maybe a little early but not by much and a position of dire need. Crawford definitely wouldn't have been my first choice. I understand the thought. But wouldn't have went for that position myself. But he was picked right around where he should have been

Stukes was picked 5-8 picks early, maybe. Also drafted later than some mocks had him. At a position of dire need and thin in the draft.

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:54 pm Don't y'all get tired of justifying bad picks? I mean really. It never works out for you guys. This team is bombing Day 2 so far. One more pick to make it right.

naw, i disagree day 2 has been a c so far, liked the stukes pick (need) crawford is for the future

Run on receivers now

raidersince63 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:06 pm I don't think they've made a final decision on the old guy yet, have they?

They want him, but he's on a mushroom retreat. He hasn't told them yet.

raiders72 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:02 pm Stukes can play
Crawford is puzzling
Again, end of day after round 3 it’s a shot in dark

Only been playing organized football for 5 year. Has a basketball background. Half-full, he’s improved year over year. (Crawford)

I wonder if Pregnon got something flagged in his medical we arent aware of.

Scratch that Pregnon isn't dropping like a stone or a brick anymore, he is dropping like some of our fans off the nearest bridge after our next pick

raider_kin wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 7:07 pm Stukes was picked 5-8 picks early, maybe. Also drafted later than some mocks had him. At a position of dire need and thin in the draft.

stukes was maybe 2-3 picks early but when filling a need you go get your guy ...plus the trade down got us another 3rd ...id say it was a win for us

Yeah, there's absolutely logic to the Crawford pick &, he wasn't a reach. He was ranked around that area. This is the team making a pick a year early. He gets experience coached up, then ready for full time starter next year. Since Koonce may move on. & if they don't see Paye as much of a pass rusher, then, Crawford was needed.

I myself didn't like the pick too much because I had a handful of players I wanted over him, at positions that were more need this year. So don't get me wrong, Crawford looks like a solid prospect.

Double post