Postgame Thread: Bears-Raiders
- Oaktownonly
- Posts: 3,642
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
- Has given High Fives: 402 times
- Received High Fives: 431 times
- The Real CK
- Posts: 17,271
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
- Has given High Fives: 1158 times
- Received High Fives: 458 times
- mranquales
- Posts: 8,105
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
- Has given High Fives: 713 times
- Received High Fives: 253 times
- Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,408
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 857 times
- Received High Fives: 463 times
No sense in beating a dead interception machine, so I won't.
There were some positives in this game. The D bailed held Chicago to 13 points off 4 turnovers.
The O-line finally looked good. Of course, now it looks like Miller's injured. But for today, they have something to feel good about. They also kept pressure off that guy who suited up to play quarterback for the Las Vegas Raiders today.
Jeanty had a breakout game. Three TDs and what, 150 rushing? Awesome to see.
People are down on the coaching, but I thought that overall it was pretty damn good. I do take exception to the third down play right before the FG attempt, BUT the coaching staff clearly did not trust the guy who put on a quarterback's uniform to not throw or pick or not take a sack, so they had that guy hand the ball off to Jeanty, so I can't be too critical of that call.
There were some positives in this game. The D bailed held Chicago to 13 points off 4 turnovers.
The O-line finally looked good. Of course, now it looks like Miller's injured. But for today, they have something to feel good about. They also kept pressure off that guy who suited up to play quarterback for the Las Vegas Raiders today.
Jeanty had a breakout game. Three TDs and what, 150 rushing? Awesome to see.
People are down on the coaching, but I thought that overall it was pretty damn good. I do take exception to the third down play right before the FG attempt, BUT the coaching staff clearly did not trust the guy who put on a quarterback's uniform to not throw or pick or not take a sack, so they had that guy hand the ball off to Jeanty, so I can't be too critical of that call.
- Oaktown Superman
- Posts: 3,019
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 621 times
- Received High Fives: 252 times
Nah! Cam Ward will have his best game of the year when he plays the Raiders.mranquales wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:07 pm The Titans game will probably be the last win on our schedule.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Oaktown Superman for the post (total 2):
- The Real CK, mranquales
- Willmark
- Posts: 14,513
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
- Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
- Has given High Fives: 904 times
- Received High Fives: 861 times
Here is a sobering thought as the slide to oblivion continues:
1960–1985 → 19/26 seasons winning (~73%).
1986–2025 → 9/40 seasons winning (~22%).
I stand by my contention that in the case of the Raiders we can pinpoint the exact date it all started to unravel, slowly at first. We didn't know it at the time but 11-30-86 vs the Eagles losing 33 to 27 marked the end of the glory years.
1960–1985 → 19/26 seasons winning (~73%).
1986–2025 → 9/40 seasons winning (~22%).
I stand by my contention that in the case of the Raiders we can pinpoint the exact date it all started to unravel, slowly at first. We didn't know it at the time but 11-30-86 vs the Eagles losing 33 to 27 marked the end of the glory years.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post (total 4):
- Oaktown Superman, GoodTimeCharlie, RenoRaider, heavyD
- Oaktown Superman
- Posts: 3,019
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 621 times
- Received High Fives: 252 times
Oh! I remember that game vividly. Marcus Allen fumbled in FG range and Andre Waters took the fumble back to around the two yard line. Randall Cunningham QB sneaked it in and the downward spiral started.Willmark wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:08 pm Here is a sobering thought as the slide to oblivion continues:
1960–1985 → 19/26 seasons winning (~73%).
1986–2025 → 9/40 seasons winning (~22%).
I stand by my contention that in the case of the Raiders we can pinpoint the exact date it all started to unravel, slowly at first. We didn't know it at the time but 11-30-86 vs the Eagles losing 33 to 27 marked the end of the glory years.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Oaktown Superman for the post (total 2):
- Willmark, GoodTimeCharlie
- Willmark
- Posts: 14,513
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
- Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
- Has given High Fives: 904 times
- Received High Fives: 861 times
I was young but didn't think it was that big of a deal at the time. Little did we know.Oaktown Superman wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:10 pm Oh! I remember that game vividly. Marcus Allen fumbled in FG range and Andre Waters took the fumble back to around the two yard line. Randall Cunningham QB sneaked it in and the downward spiral started.
- Raidernation1979
- Posts: 8,065
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
- Has given High Fives: 385 times
- Received High Fives: 882 times
Are we really still talking about Carrbage here? Whataboutism for 2 bad qbs is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen. We need to draft qbs in rounds 1-3 every season until one hits.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Raidernation1979 for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,584
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1483 times
- Received High Fives: 1350 times
Willmark wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:08 pm Here is a sobering thought as the slide to oblivion continues:
1960–1985 → 19/26 seasons winning (~73%).
1986–2025 → 9/40 seasons winning (~22%).
I stand by my contention that in the case of the Raiders we can pinpoint the exact date it all started to unravel, slowly at first. We didn't know it at the time but 11-30-86 vs the Eagles losing 33 to 27 marked the end of the glory years.
Hot damn! That’s some phenomenal recall gentlemen. I’m just happy I could remember where I put my glasses so I could read it.Oaktown Superman wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:10 pm Oh! I remember that game vividly. Marcus Allen fumbled in FG range and Andre Waters took the fumble back to around the two yard line. Randall Cunningham QB sneaked it in and the downward spiral started.
- These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 2):
- Oaktown Superman, raider_kin
- Willmark
- Posts: 14,513
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
- Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
- Has given High Fives: 904 times
- Received High Fives: 861 times
Agreed. I've been saying that very thing for a while now.Raidernation1979 wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:16 pm Are we really still talking about Carrbage here? Whataboutism for 2 bad qbs is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen. We need to draft qbs in rounds 1-3 every season until one hits.
Most QBs will fail in the NFL for any number of reasons. The optimal strategy to mitigate that is to draft a QB high every 1-3 years until you hit. I also think it makes sense to draft a QB late rounds 5-7. Think about those late round guys. In most cases they are special teams players so allocating a pick to QB isn't really a waste considering the importance of QB. And if you do get lucky? You're not likely to get a round 6 Pick 199, those only come around next to never really but a Brock Purdy? Better than what have had at QB since Gannon.
There is no other position in sports that matters more.
So what do the Raiders do? Either go with retread vets or give "Boy Wonder" the reigns for nearly 10 years, pay him like an elite QB and get non-elite play. But hey, at least he holds all the "All Time Raiders QB records!!!!!"
In either case the Raiders looked at the sub-optimal choice. Repeatedly and said "hold my beer."
Can't make this stuff up.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post (total 2):
- GoodTimeCharlie, Raidernation1979
- RenoRaider
- Posts: 1,680
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 3:45 am
- Has given High Fives: 66 times
- Received High Fives: 14 times
How strange! I thought this team was finally rekindling the
dynasty.
So anyway…
Defense played a great game. Maxx was great! Even Wilson got a sack. Didn’t have that one on my BINGO card.
Jeanty finally had his break out game!
Losing Miller dooms this team (as if it wasn’t bad enough) to a max of 4 wins (if they’re lucky.
Why is Beck invisible?
I’m excited to see Geno break the INT record and finally topple Jameis Winston with 30+ ints.
Cherry on top:
Hearing the stadium erupt into cheers when the FG was blocked.
Great work, Davis.
dynasty.
So anyway…
Defense played a great game. Maxx was great! Even Wilson got a sack. Didn’t have that one on my BINGO card.
Jeanty finally had his break out game!
Losing Miller dooms this team (as if it wasn’t bad enough) to a max of 4 wins (if they’re lucky.
Why is Beck invisible?
I’m excited to see Geno break the INT record and finally topple Jameis Winston with 30+ ints.
Cherry on top:
Hearing the stadium erupt into cheers when the FG was blocked.
Great work, Davis.
- These users gave a High Five to the author RenoRaider for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Willmark
- Posts: 14,513
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
- Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
- Has given High Fives: 904 times
- Received High Fives: 861 times
To be honest I hadn't thought much about that game until my son became an Eagles fan. I didn't remember the exact date but I did remember the fumble as Allen was and still is my favorite Raider player.GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:19 pm Hot damn! That’s some phenomenal recall gentlemen. I’m just happy I could remember where I put my glasses so I could read it.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Dr Death
- Posts: 3,729
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
- Has given High Fives: 3767 times
- Received High Fives: 890 times
3 wins is all I see for this team. I don't even know what to say.
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,584
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1483 times
- Received High Fives: 1350 times
I agree 100%. Unreal that this franchise is still too scared to draft a 1st rounder since ‘07. It’s almost like Big Al made that his final dying wish to Turnip. The time to move this franchise into the modern age with a billionaire owner or billionaire conglomerate is long overdue.Willmark wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:22 pm Agreed. I've been saying that very thing for a while now.
Most QBs will fail in the NFL for any number of reasons. The optimal strategy to mitigate that is to draft a QB high 1-3 years until you hit. I also think it makes sense to draft a QB late rounds 5-7. Think about those late round guys. In most cases they are special teams players so allocating a pick to QB isn't really a waste considering the importance of QB.
There is no other position in sports that matters more.
So what do the Raiders do? Either go with retread vets or give "Boy Wonder" the reigns for nearly 10 years, pay him like an elite QB and get non-elite play. But hey, at least he holds all the "All Time Raiders QB records!!!!!"
![]()
In either case the Raiders looked at the sub-optimal choice. Repeatedly and said "hold my beer."
Can't make this stuff up.
Different decade, same team.
- These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
- Dr Death
- srv5490
- Posts: 3,471
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:14 pm
- Location: Returning Videotapes
- Has given High Fives: 87 times
- Received High Fives: 258 times
Bad day for the Raiders, but apparently a good day for the incel trolls on this site.
- These users gave a High Five to the author srv5490 for the post (total 5):
- GoodTimeCharlie, LayneStaley, Hellbound, Toast, Trainnvain