Raiders season finale game thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 15,972
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 228 times
Received High Fives: 383 times

Raiders season finale game thread

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

The Raiders finish the year off against the Chiefs.

Will the tank make it all the way home?
These users gave a High Five to the author RaiderandBulldog for the post:
Oaktown Superman
User avatar
Toast
Posts: 2,707
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
Has given High Fives: 554 times
Received High Fives: 1004 times

Unread post by Toast »

Smucky wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 1:33 pm Even though we can still win today and keep this pick, I still have trouble caring today if we win or not. This isn’t the Raiders or the Chiefs. It feels like the strike season. Except I don’t get to see Vince Evans and Eddie Anderson.
Good god that dredges up some memories. Eddie Anderson ended being a solid safety though he gave Al cause to deem Vann McElroy expendable. Which sucked.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,105
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 713 times
Received High Fives: 253 times

Unread post by mranquales »

If Pete Carroll remains the coach, Mendoza might not play.
User avatar
RaiderFan1
Posts: 1,567
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2021 9:30 am
Has given High Fives: 159 times
Received High Fives: 151 times

Unread post by RaiderFan1 »

mranquales wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 6:01 pm If Pete Carroll remains the coach, Mendoza might not play.
1st Class Ass Sniffer
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

HolyRoller wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 4:27 pm How stupid - win a meaningless, terrible game - during the draft you can see what this cost us. I guarantee not having that first pick of the 2nd round will be painful.
I think we should just be grateful to have the 1st pick now. Not having the 1st pick in the 2nd round is not going to cost us a chance at a Good head Coach and Franchise QB. Don’t get greedy
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
16 to 88
User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Opoponax50 wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:42 pm If the future of this team depends on choosing between #33 and #36, we're entirely fcked anyway. Same with the rest of the draft spots.
Yeah, 3 spots in round 2 isn’t going to be the difference in the rebuild.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
Opoponax50
User avatar
rich72
Posts: 8,323
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 552 times
Received High Fives: 306 times

Unread post by rich72 »

Toast wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:23 pm I was what I was hoping for. A Cowboy loss handed us the first pick and we beat the Chiefs. Not a bad way to end such as a crummy season. If it is to be Fernando (we have a lot of time to speculate). I am hoping he and the right coaching change can lead this team to a new era of football. A vastly better one. Maxx being on the sideline was encouraging.

As so far as I am concerned it was a great day.

Now let's see if Pete survives black tomorrow. There is a lot to sort out prior to the Super Bowl.
They need to clear him and his crew out fast and start the new search. Think Patrick Graham should go also this time around.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,408
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 857 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

DanKD wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:43 pm I highly doubt it. Dallas needs cost controlled assets. I see other teams going harder for Maxx
Whatever team is willing to give the most for him. That's all I care about. I brought up Dallas because they have two first rounders in this coming draft and they need defensive players badly.
User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 7,901
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 808 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

DanKD wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:43 pm I highly doubt it. Dallas needs cost controlled assets. I see other teams going harder for Maxx
Correct. They are in cap hell. That's the only reason they traded Parsons. They are not going to give up the assets they fot just to get another high priced player. They need to hit with those picks not pick up more salary. Several people have brought up the Cowboys I guess because they have 2 firsts
User avatar
Corleone
Posts: 20,573
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 257 times
Received High Fives: 1111 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

SkullCrusher wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 5:39 pm

Geno is way better than what he showed here, we have video proof of that.
No, the video proof we have is of a full seaosn of Geno Smith playing at age 35, and we know exactly what happened. It's not the Raiders fault Geno played poorly, this is what happens to 99% of players at age 35, but because a few elite QB's have performed beyond that age, our 74 year old head coach gambled that Geno would be one of them. Turns out, the QB who was bad for most of his career, was bad at age 35, who could have predicted it?
These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post:
rcraider
User avatar
HesterLayes
Posts: 6,059
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 19 times
Received High Fives: 170 times

Unread post by HesterLayes »

As long as we have the numero uno I don’t care..it’s not a loaded draft anyway and I’m not going to fret over a few picks in the second on guys most of this board won’t even know…

We got our golden goose and it was cool seeing him bang a 60 yarder
User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Corleone wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 6:57 pm No, the video proof we have is of a full seaosn of Geno Smith playing at age 35, and we know exactly what happened. It's not the Raiders fault Geno played poorly, this is what happens to 99% of players at age 35, but because a few elite QB's have performed beyond that age, our 74 year old head coach gambled that Geno would be one of them. Turns out, the QB who was bad for most of his career, was bad at age 35, who could have predicted it?
Everything you say is true but I still haven’t heard anyone explain to me why the geniuses in Seattle offered him an extension after last season.
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Seeing Kelce’s face realizing his (potential) last game is losing to the Raiders..priceless.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
LayneStaley
User avatar
Corleone
Posts: 20,573
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 257 times
Received High Fives: 1111 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

Jeevo wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 7:01 pm Everything you say is true but I still haven’t heard anyone explain to me why the geniuses in Seattle offered him an extension after last season.
I know you've said it many times, it's been reported plenty, I just don't happen to believe that Geno was offered that money and turned it down. I believe it was team/agent spin to get another team to step up and pay that money/trade assets. Both sides benefit from that rumor.

Reminds me of when it was rumored Houston was pursuing Jimmy G before we signed him. Houston ended up drafting Stroud and there's no reason to believe they were actually interested in Jimmy.

Not everything we hear is actually the truth.
User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Corleone wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 7:08 pm I know you've said it many times, it's been reported plenty, I just don't happen to believe that Geno was offered that money and turned it down. I believe it was team/agent spin to get another team to step up and pay that money/trade assets. Both sides benefit from that rumor.

Reminds me of when it was rumored Houston was pursuing Jimmy G before we signed him. Houston ended up drafting Stroud and there's no reason to believe they were actually interested in Jimmy.

Not everything we hear is actually the truth.
There’s a clip of Schneider saying that they did make him an offer.

Doesn’t matter though, you had it right all along.
User avatar
Corleone
Posts: 20,573
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 257 times
Received High Fives: 1111 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

Jeevo wrote: Sun Jan 04, 2026 7:11 pm There’s a clip of Schneider saying that they did make him an offer.
yes, it benefits the team to pretend they wanted to keep him, it keeps the trade value up, and got the Raiders to pay up a 3rd rounder. It was a very shrewd move to pretend they wanted to keep Geno.
Post Reply