Ashton Jeanty

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Ashton Jeanty

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 577 times
Received High Fives: 645 times

Unread post by Viper »

chucker wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:11 am It will be interesting to see what they do with the oline. It's possible that they really believe there's more potential there with Glaze than fans think there is. It's also possible they think Grant has real potential to be a contributor at RT this year. It's also possible that they are just acting like the oline isn't an issue so they can improve it without other teams knowing what a priority it is. I think the blocking scheme will be really good for Jeanty, but they still have to learn to execute it and that's going to take time.
Convincing other teams our O line isn’t an issue would be as futile as me trying to convince myself I’m good looking.
Nobody’s buying that obvious smoke screen.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,122
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 968 times
Received High Fives: 535 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

I would like to increase the odds of possible and draft OL in the 2nd.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post:
raidersince63
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:17 am I would like to increase the odds of possible and draft OL in the 2nd.
Same here...though we have already acquired an OL starter, I don't think we should assume that it should end there...more competition will surely make us better and hopefully give us more depth..
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Viper wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:16 am Convincing other teams our O line isn’t an issue would be as futile as me trying to convince myself I’m good looking.
Nobody’s buying that obvious smoke screen.
Dude, give yourself credit: you slay :goofy:
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post (total 4):
Viper, raidersince63, Jeevo, RI RAIDER
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

raidersince63 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:27 am Same here...though we have already acquired an OL starter, I don't think we should assume that it should end there...more competition will surely make us better and hopefully give us more depth..
Can we get a starting O lineman in the 3rd? Guard probably, tackle I'm not sure.
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

Unread post by chucker »

Viper wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:16 am Convincing other teams our O line isn’t an issue would be as futile as me trying to convince myself I’m good looking.
Nobody’s buying that obvious smoke screen.
It's hard to say though. Miller and Linderbaum are quality starters, no doubt. I think most people believe JPJ is a viable solid starter, or better, at guard. Rogers was a third round pick last year and showed enough that he is a "more likely than not" starter.

The one starting spot that is a big question mark is RT, and they may look at Glaze's college tape and 2024 tape pre-BrennanChip and think he has some potential. Seattle had an awful oline in 2024 and then added one draft pick in 2025 and inserted a second year undrafted tackle at center with no NFL starting experience and won the SB. Our Oline today is as good or better than the oline that Seattle went into the season with.

I know we'll add in the draft, because you add to the oline in the draft every year. I will certainly feel better about it if we add a RT in the 2nd, but Kubiak and Dennison may feel that they have something to work with among the players already on the roster including a massive upgrade at center. And they could feel that way and still be wrong.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 3):
Viper, RickRyb, Goodtimes333
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,122
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 968 times
Received High Fives: 535 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

raider_kin wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:30 am Can we get a starting O lineman in the 3rd? Guard probably, tackle I'm not sure.
I am not even convinced we can get a starting OT (at least not a day 1 starter) in the 2nd. We can get a day 1 starting OG in Pregnon (who is a beast). It looks like (anything can happen) he will be there for the taking with our pick.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 2):
KillerRaider30, raider_kin
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 577 times
Received High Fives: 645 times

Unread post by Viper »

chucker wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:08 am It's hard to say though. Miller and Linderbaum are quality starters, no doubt. I think most people believe JPJ is a viable solid starter, or better, at guard. Rogers was a third round pick last year and showed enough that he is a "more likely than not" starter.

The one starting spot that is a big question mark is RT, and they may look at Glaze's college tape and 2024 tape pre-BrennanChip and think he has some potential. Seattle had an awful oline in 2024 and then added one draft pick in 2025 and inserted a second year undrafted tackle at center with no NFL starting experience and won the SB. Our Oline today is as good or better than the oline that Seattle went into the season with.

I know we'll add in the draft, because you add to the oline in the draft every year. I will certainly feel better about it if we add a RT in the 2nd, but Kubiak and Dennison may feel that they have something to work with among the players already on the roster including a massive upgrade at center. And they could feel that way and still be wrong.
All good points but I was kidding mostly, except the dissing on myself.
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post (total 2):
RI RAIDER, raider_kin
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

raider_kin wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:30 am Can we get a starting O lineman in the 3rd? Guard probably, tackle I'm not sure.
Hard to say, there are gambles in drafting regardless of position but we won't know who will available after the 1st round because there are always surprises on draft day/s...still a couple of weeks away so the stock in some draftees could rise or fall between now and then.

Some of the very best linemen, OL and DL, were drafted after the first round so obviously they are out there, we just need to hope that management is as smart as we hope, and that they make the smart choices.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
RI RAIDER, raider_kin
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

raidersince63 wrote: Wed Apr 08, 2026 6:02 pm It's his yards after contact that impresses me the most'
agree ashton was incredible getting positive yds even though he was contacted at the line or behind the line over 50% of the time
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 6:17 am I would like to increase the odds of possible and draft OL in the 2nd.
with multiple 4th rd picks expect a run on guard and rt in the 4th rd, we need run stuffing big boy in the middle of the line at nt/dt, we also need a wr1
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

RI RAIDER wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:11 am I am not even convinced we can get a starting OT (at least not a day 1 starter) in the 2nd. We can get a day 1 starting OG in Pregnon (who is a beast). It looks like (anything can happen) he will be there for the taking with our pick.
every yr in the draft quality starting oline guys at guard and rt are found, some turn into all pros
User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

Viper wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 7:40 am All good points but I was kidding mostly, except the dissing on myself.
You look just like Bill Murray, not a stud, but lovable in the way that the lots of chicks love to get into.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post (total 3):
RI RAIDER, raider_kin, Viper
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,122
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 968 times
Received High Fives: 535 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 8:00 am every yr in the draft quality starting oline guys at guard and rt are found, some turn into all pros
Nobody said they did not, but they are few and far between. You always need luck. That being said, the odds of getting a quality day 1 starting RT diminish greatly after the middle of the first (they are obviously a bigger commodity than G). The NFL has always treated guards like red headed stepchildren. Lets use it to our advantage and grab a day 1 starting guard (its not like its not a big need). There is nothing better than having a bunch of kids starting who are on rookie deals. Obviously, it makes it easier to build your team.
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

I believe if The Raiders make a trade to move back in the 1st round it will be for a WR. Not an O-Lineman
Post Reply