2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Choose a second rounder

Poll ended at Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:19 am

CB: McCoy
1
2%
CB: Terrell
0
No votes
DT: McDonald
32
48%
DT: Miller
3
5%
OL: Pregnon
11
17%
OL: Bisontis
3
5%
WR: Boston
9
14%
WR: Bernard
0
No votes
MISC: Other
7
11%
Total votes: 66

User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Unread post by Xramfan »

Who do we want?

Discuss
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

The Bills glaring problem seemed to be that they left Allen with subpar weapons for receivers. Wouldn't surprise me if they went WR.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, BoKnows81
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Yeah Boston to Buf makes some sense.
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:15 pm
****sigh****
These users gave a High Five to the author RickRyb for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,513
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 904 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by Willmark »

RickRyb wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:41 pm****sigh****
No matter which side of the argument one falls on, there is indeed a price to pay when we won that game: we are looking at it right now.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post (total 3):
Rabidraider, BoKnows81, MexicanHulk
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

Willmark wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:50 pm No matter which side of the argument one falls on, there is indeed a price to pay when we won that game: we are looking at it right now.
If we get McDonald I will finally let it go... :rofl:
These users gave a High Five to the author Rabidraider for the post (total 3):
mstrbass2000, MexicanHulk, BoJacksonRules
User avatar
Hellbound
Posts: 6,432
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 549 times
Received High Fives: 808 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Willmark wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:50 pm No matter which side of the argument one falls on, there is indeed a price to pay when we won that game: we are looking at it right now.
Picking higher is always more ideal, but this team has so many holes and depth issues that it doesn't matter who we pick, they're going to be an upgrade and get playing time
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

My ideal picks tonight:

2nd - Kayden McDonald
3rd - Gennings Dunker
Trade back into 3rd to grab Skyler Bell

While not ideal, I would be OK with Jacob Rodriguez as well. Man that dude is a player. We could look back and ask why he wasn't a 1st rounder. They all just agreed on NFL.com that he will be DROY and I can totally see it.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
Rabidraider, BoJacksonRules
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,513
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 904 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by Willmark »

Hellbound wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 3:08 pm Picking higher is always more ideal, but this team has so many holes and depth issues that it doesn't matter who we pick, they're going to be an upgrade and get playing time
I'm pointing out that the sugar high of winning a meaningless game has a cost that people ignored at the time. That reality is no playing itself out.
These users gave a High Five to the author Willmark for the post:
Hellbound
User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

mstrbass2000 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:15 pm
What kind of sic bastard ………….
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Xramfan wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 3:14 pm What kind of sic bastard ………….
You know what's even sicker? There were actual humans rooting for that kick at the time knowing the consequences.
User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

Unread post by Xramfan »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 3:16 pm You know what's even sicker? There were actual humans rooting for that kick at the time knowing the consequences.
Oh I know. I was praying for a miss and pissed he made it.


If the chiefs were playing for a playoff spot and had their starters playing I can understand wanting to destroy them and take them out but the game was meaningless and against their 3rd stringers. We hurt ourselves while helping them at the same time
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post (total 3):
Hellbound, BoKnows81, Dr Death
User avatar
Rabidraider
Posts: 2,078
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2023 4:45 pm
Has given High Fives: 1381 times
Received High Fives: 774 times

Unread post by Rabidraider »

BoKnows81 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 3:16 pm You know what's even sicker? There were actual humans rooting for that kick at the time knowing the consequences.
We all have to thank God for the NY Giants...
User avatar
Hellbound
Posts: 6,432
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 549 times
Received High Fives: 808 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

Willmark wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 3:13 pm I'm pointing out that the sugar high of winning a meaningless game has a cost that people ignored at the time. That reality is no playing itself out.
I get it but I also think picking 3 spots higher is getting a bit blown out of proportion. Spytek will still have a group of players he likes and will still be able to get who he wants. Does it suck to not necessarily have the pick of the litter? Absolutely....is the pick so far down that you're getting blocked from the group of players you have your eyes on? No it doesn't
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post:
SkullCrusher
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Hellbound wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 3:08 pm Picking higher is always more ideal, but this team has so many holes and depth issues that it doesn't matter who we pick, they're going to be an upgrade and get playing time
It depends on year, like this year we hit it big with Fern. But being 1rst in the second might not be a big deal this year, we won't know until the pick happens.
Post Reply