Raiderstation

Has this been verified anywhere else?

https://x.com/mitchellrenz365/status/19 ... 62546?s=46

“Saturday nights all right for fighting….”

Elton was on to something.

[quote=pfish57 post_id=1290819] The only purpose 16 to 88 has on this forum is to get on his knees & agree with every Attyla post it's kinda pathetic lol[/quote]Was I wrong?

-- Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:48 am --

[quote=BoKnows81 post_id=1290821]And don't forget wasting forum space by obsessively thanking posters for posting articles or videos[/quote]so being nice and polite is a bad thing?

[quote=Attyla post_id=1290823]Was I wrong?

-- Sun Jun 29, 2025 5:48 am --

so being nice and polite is a bad thing?[/quote]As intelligent as i’ve heard both of them say they are neither of them get the irony of accusing others about wasting space & agreeing with another poster whilst being so pathetic polishing each other off every time one of them says anything

The simple fact is your right injuries & that the move for Wilkins was the perfect move we were just unfortunate, players of Wilkins ilk don’t make free agency that often when they are in the prime so when they do you have to go for them.

[quote=CWood24 post_id=1290830]As intelligent as i’ve heard both of them say they are neither of them get the irony of accusing others about wasting space & agreeing with another poster whilst being so pathetic polishing each other off every time one of them says anything

The simple fact is your right injuries & that the move for Wilkins was the perfect move we were just unfortunate, players of Wilkins ilk don’t make free agency that often when they are in the prime so when they do you have to go for them.[/quote]You thought it was a travesty that Brock Bowers didn't win OROY over Jayden Daniels. Says all we need to know about your credibility.

[quote=BoKnows81 post_id=1290832]You thought it was a travesty that Brock Bowers didn't win OROY over Jayden Daniels. Says all we need to know about your credibility.[/quote]The stats say one had an historical season the other a solid one filled with emotion but lets ignore the fact as you always do

You can’t talk about credibility? Sam Darnold anyone

Did you message you little buddy to like your comment to make you feel important or dis you ask him when you were in the circle with him

[quote=CWood24 post_id=1290834]The stats say one had an historical season the other a solid one filled with emotion but lets ignore the fact as you always do

You can’t talk about credibility? Sam Darnold anyone

Did you message you little buddy to like your comment to make you feel important or dis you ask him when you were in the circle with him[/quote]Sam Darnold what? The Seahawks obviously agreed with me and considering the terms, getting rid of Geno while signing Darnold was 100% the better option. Keep reaching sad little boy. Your homerism is blinding you.

In my hope for a winning or close to .500 season getting the D line back healthy of course included Wilkins. I fear without the defensive stud we might not reach our lofty goals this year. Bummer.

[quote=BoKnows81 post_id=1290836]Sam Darnold what? The Seahawks obviously agreed with me and considering the money and compensation, getting rid of Geno while signing Darnold was 100% the better option. Keep reaching sad little boy. Your homerism is blinding you.[/quote]Your point is void though since Minnesota didn’t agree with you & they saw him close up rather than from a distance

If you were that good then wouldn’t they keep you around?

Haven’t you invalidated your own point

[quote=CWood24 post_id=1290839]Your point is void though since Minnesota didn’t agree with you & they saw him close up rather than from a distance

If you were that good then wouldn’t they keep you around?[/quote]Again that credibility of yours is concerning. The Vikings had a 1st round pick with loads of potential waiting in the wings! Why on Earth would they keep Darnold? And FWIW, I said this before Darnold was traded and was laughed off the forum. Go check the history if you want. You don't keep a guy like Darnold bc you don't want the rook looking over his shoulder. So, that's why. Pretty simple to grasp if you ask me.

Brady did not want Darnold. That is all you need to know.

Most off seasons there is plenty to bitch about. This off season is a little boring (in a good way). But wow, it’s getting feisty in here these days.

Go Raiders

[quote=Xramfan post_id=1290845]Most off seasons there is plenty to bitch about. This off season is a little boring (in a good way). But wow, it’s getting feisty in here these days.

Go Raiders[/quote]Brady likes feisty too.

[quote=Xramfan post_id=1290845]Most off seasons there is plenty to bitch about. This off season is a little boring (in a good way). But wow, it’s getting feisty in here these days.

Go Raiders[/quote]Here is how I view it, and this is just my opinion. The Saints signed Carr and threw a bunch of money at him. That has to mean all the Carr supporters must be right and I was wrong about him.....oh wait.

[quote=Attyla post_id=1290848]Here is how I view it, and this is just my opinion. The Saints signed Carr and threw a bunch of money at him. That has to mean all the Carr supporters must be right and I was wrong about him.....oh wait.[/quote]But the Raiders let Carr go without even getting any compensation so all the Carr detractors were right. Am I doing this right?

[quote=Trainnvain post_id=1290850]But the Raiders let Carr go without even getting any compensation so all the Carr detractors were right. Am I doing this right?[/quote]I think you are on to something there. I also think the Carr injury mirrors the Wilkins injury in that the injury is the reason they are washed, not so much the play on the field. Well, the Carr one was just the cherry on top.

But yes, I will give your post a gold star. I guess now I have become the very thing I despise or some such bullshit.