Brady supposedly steered Raiders away from Darnold.
- RunOverByHubbard
- Posts: 13,103
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
- Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
- Has given High Fives: 106 times
- Received High Fives: 574 times
- BoKnows81
- Posts: 6,999
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 963 times
- Received High Fives: 2276 times
Yea, uh, wrong.RaiderandBulldog wrote: Wed May 06, 2026 11:22 pm Darnold would have done no better than Geno if he was our QB last year.
People still making excuses for Geno like he didn't make the WHOLE team worse, is hilarious. Darnold, or any competent QB, gets MINIMUM 3 more wins.
- These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
- Diesis, MexicanHulk
- WNYRAIDER
- Posts: 4,016
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 208 times
- Received High Fives: 243 times
while I can only so much against geno for how he played when trying to perform in that trd offense, and with that line play, how he behaved should embarrass him. ....quite the punk.....
- Diesis
- Posts: 2,716
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:42 pm
- Has given High Fives: 48 times
- Received High Fives: 9 times
We should therefore be thankful that we had Geno last year as it has led to us getting out of the QB purgatory that we had been stuck in for decades.BoKnows81 wrote: Thu May 07, 2026 3:48 am Yea, uh, wrong.
People still making excuses for Geno like he didn't make the WHOLE team worse, is hilarious. Darnold, or any competent QB, gets MINIMUM 3 more wins.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter who or how we have got here, we are now in a much better place with what we all hope is our franchise QB for the next 15 years.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Diesis for the post (total 2):
- raidersince63, Owsley Stanley
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
Yup, what an inane argument...if it's not about AOC, it's about Geno who's no longer on the roster.Diesis wrote: Thu May 07, 2026 4:35 am We should therefore be thankful that we had Geno last year as it has led to us getting out of the QB purgatory that we had been stuck in for decades.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter who or how we have got here, we are now in a much better place with what we all hope is our franchise QB for the next 15 years.
...are some people really this bored?...seriously, what difference does it make?
- BoKnows81
- Posts: 6,999
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 963 times
- Received High Fives: 2276 times
For sure. I stated that earlier. But the Geno apologists need to be fact checked.Diesis wrote: Thu May 07, 2026 4:35 am We should therefore be thankful that we had Geno last year as it has led to us getting out of the QB purgatory that we had been stuck in for decades.
At the end of the day it doesn't matter who or how we have got here, we are now in a much better place with what we all hope is our franchise QB for the next 15 years.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
Opinions are not facts.
- These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
- dred, RickRyb
- BoKnows81
- Posts: 6,999
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 963 times
- Received High Fives: 2276 times
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
...lol, what? So according to you, anyone who doesn't make a mountain out of a mole hole hill out of Geno or AOC is by default either a "fan boy" or an "appologist"?
...both Geno and AOC are individual players on a squad of many, a TEAM loses games, not individuals.
...both Geno and AOC are individual players on a squad of many, a TEAM loses games, not individuals.
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
The amount of time people spend bitching about the topic of conversation seems futile at best. What do you do on a forum? Discuss topics. Just because you personally do not like the topic does not mean we should not have the topic. You don't find value in a conversation? Don't talk about it. But wasting others time dismissing the value of the topic is just worthless.BoKnows81 wrote: Thu May 07, 2026 5:17 am ^Yea, typical response from you. What's so difficult to understand? Geno Smith singlehandedly lost games for the Raiders last year and made every player around him worse. Its on tape. Watch it.
If you want, you can private message me for more information.
As for this particular conversation? I necro'd this particular thread because I found some humor on chuckers take from a year ago and tied it to Mendoza. We are in between times when the action is hot and heavy. What are we to do? Talk about a third string QB? Oh wait...
- These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post (total 2):
- BoKnows81, FLORIDARAYDAH
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
Ah, so evidently bitching about a topic is verboten, but bitching about bitching is OK,
- chucker
- Posts: 16,767
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 1823 times
- Received High Fives: 2454 times
Bitching about a topic doesn't have a place here.
Bitching about bitching doesn't have a place here.
Posting about PMs doesn't have a place here.
Bitching about bitching doesn't have a place here.
Posting about PMs doesn't have a place here.
- These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 5):
- FLORIDARAYDAH, Diesis, Owsley Stanley, raidersince63, mstrbass2000