Rookie Mini Camp.

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,264
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 511 times
Received High Fives: 468 times

Rookie Mini Camp.

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

Post any interviews, pods, pictures or stories here.

The rooks are in the building. Mostly to sign, take a physicals and talk to reporters with a a couple light workouts.
Let's go
These users gave a High Five to the author KillerRaider30 for the post:
NoThanksSir
User avatar
pfish57
Posts: 8,425
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
Has given High Fives: 400 times
Received High Fives: 898 times

Unread post by pfish57 »

raidersince63 wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 5:15 pm I dunno...this off season compared to last year just seems to have a completely different feel to me. What they've done so far with FAs and the draft has impressed me quite a bit and though we're not a real threat for a SB title yet, I believe we've improved the roster on both sides of the ball.

Last year I never liked the decisions and hires of Pete and his crew and never liked the Geno hiring and I got hammered for that and found myself SMH half way thru the 1st quarter of games...if we're at least competitive this year and enjoyable to watch again, I'll be shickled titless. :grin:
I'm definitely optimistic, but trust no f[raiders_icon]cking way...the raiders are a if it can go wrong it will go wrong franchise!
These users gave a High Five to the author pfish57 for the post (total 3):
Dr Death, raidersince63, Xramfan
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

pfish57 wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 5:23 pm I'm definitely optimistic, but trust no f[raiders_icon]cking way...the raiders are a if it can go wrong it will go wrong franchise!
Hopefully, for all of us, that's all in the past.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
nitroraider
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

NoThanksSir wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 3:33 pm I think Mendoza is the real deal, but he's not Peyton Manning. I actually think he could use some time to learn, he's not there yet. I'm still convinced he's our future but I think there is a reasonable argument for saving him until the rest of the team gets their shit together. That might mean he doesn't play until October or November, and I'm fine with that. This guy is no stranger to earning his spot either. I think he wants it to unfold like this. He's going to beat out Cousins eventually. He's the better QB on a long enough timeline
Just my opinion, but based on what we know of him so far, I believe what we can count on is whether Mendoza started Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, or next year, he’s eventually the starter. Not only is he eventually the starter, he’ll eventually be winning us football games. He’s a “franchise” quarterback. The Raiders have a f[raiders_icon]cking true-blue franchise quarterback.

All it is is a difference in trajectory. It will still end up in the same place, Mendoza leading the Raiders onto the football field. As much as I’m excited to see him out there, I can wait too. Been waiting 24 years. We haven’t seen a playoff win since 2002. There’s some sad poetry in putting the Raiders “Era of Incompetence” at a tidy 25 years.

It may be asking for a lot for Mendoza to lead us to a playoff win next year, but I think it could happen. He can take us to the playoffs and bring to a close a quarter f[raiders_icon]cking century of frustration, futility, and disappointment. He’ll do it by bringing back what was lost. By restoring what this franchise once stood for. A “Commitment to Excellence”.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 4):
Dr Death, Opoponax50, ELCAraiderfan, EnglandRaider
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

FLORIDARAYDAH wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 5:20 pm We don't have either. Solid O line and solid weapons. Sounds like you are not sure of Mendoza and are building in excuses to me.
If he doesn't start day 1 it's because they don't feel he is ready IMO
We have satisfactory receiving options and the OL is a mystery, but one thing I don't want is a f[raiders_icon]cked up arm and leg for taking a beating if we suck. That's stupid management.
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,098
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1218 times
Received High Fives: 448 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 6):
GoodTimeCharlie, Raider Nation, Dr Death, KillerRaider30, RI RAIDER, SkullCrusher
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Goodtimes333 wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 9:07 pm
First pro minicamp and Mendo with the perfect placement. f[raiders_icon]ck yeah. :pirateflag:
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post:
Goodtimes333
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

Just hype…

These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 3):
Goodtimes333, KillerRaider30, RI RAIDER
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,122
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 968 times
Received High Fives: 535 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

NewEraX25 wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 4:54 pm So he is infallible?
I never said that. I have yet to see a QB (or any person for that matter) who was infallible. All I am saying is that this kids ability and intelligence is off the charts. Does that guarantee he is a week 1 starter? I will be disappointed if he is not, but I would understand (and would not jump off a bridge) if Cousin's # is called week one. I just think our OL and WR's (albeit improved) are very questionable at best. Couple that with the fact that offenses are always behind defenses to start a season, and I could see the reasoning behind not starting him week 1. Maybe the staff wants to ensure that the kinks are worked out (let Cousins get knocked around) before calling Mendoza's # (why expose Mendoza to psyche or physical damage).

I really believe the Pats recipe for handling Maye might be a good recipe to follow. The Pats (who had a worse situation for Maye than we currently have for Mendoza) decided to sit Maye for a few games. They gave him a few snaps before bringing him in as a starter. He suffered an injury a short time after and when he came back, he started and never looked back. I could see something like that happening to Mendoza. I know some over here thought it was good to let Maye sit so he could learn. I believe that is rubbish and it had more to do with the aforementioned. How much did Maye learn holding the clipboard for a few weeks? He could have learned something, but I believe he was held out for ulterior motives than for just a learning experience. Sorry about the long post.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post:
Loftyraider
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

NewEraX25 wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 4:53 pm It's common for rookies who haven't signed yet to sign a waiver that protects them in the event they get injured prior to signing.
I was going to say this, I thought it’s ok for Rookies who haven’t signed yet to participate in Rookie mini camp, it’s training camp where they need to be signed. Remember last year Jack Bech and most of the 2nd round picks in the NFL hadn’t signed until training camp because the one guy who got drafted early in the 2nd was holding out. And Bech participated last year during Rookie camp, he was running drills.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
SkullCrusher
User avatar
Dr Death
Posts: 3,729
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 3767 times
Received High Fives: 890 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

RI RAIDER wrote: Sat May 02, 2026 5:26 am I never said that. I have yet to see a QB (or any person for that matter) who was infallible. All I am saying is that this kids ability and intelligence is off the charts. Does that guarantee he is a week 1 starter? I will be disappointed if he is not, but I would understand (and would not jump off a bridge) if Cousin's # is called week one. I just think our OL and WR's (albeit improved) are very questionable at best. Couple that with the fact that offenses are always behind defenses to start a season, and I could see the reasoning behind not starting him week 1. Maybe the staff wants to ensure that the kinks are worked out (let Cousins get knocked around) before calling Mendoza's # (why expose Mendoza to psyche or physical damage).

I really believe the Pats recipe for handling Maye might be a good recipe to follow. The Pats (who had a worse situation for Maye than we currently have for Mendoza) decided to sit Maye for a few games. They gave him a few snaps before bringing him in as a starter. He suffered an injury a short time after and when he came back, he started and never looked back. I could see something like that happening to Mendoza. I know some over here thought it was good to let Maye sit so he could learn. I believe that is rubbish and it had more to do with the aforementioned. How much did Maye learn holding the clipboard for a few weeks? He could have learned something, but I believe he was held out for ulterior motives than for just a learning experience. Sorry about the long post.
I think you are going to be disappointed... as are a few more on here. It's almost a lock that Cousins will start the season...IMO. I don't see that as a bad thing. I know some disagree with that, and I understand it. With both Kubiak and Brady stating they don't want a rookie starting the season, I think Cousins is as close to a lock as you will get for starting the season in this new regime.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post (total 3):
raidersince63, ELCAraiderfan, Vercingetorix
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,264
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 511 times
Received High Fives: 468 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Fri May 01, 2026 9:52 pm First pro minicamp and Mendo with the perfect placement. f[raiders_icon]ck yeah. :pirateflag:
I said a light workout but they were going full speed for sure.
I felt a lot of energy out there.
These users gave a High Five to the author KillerRaider30 for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
rcraider
Posts: 994
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:46 pm
Has given High Fives: 370 times
Received High Fives: 277 times

Unread post by rcraider »

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Sat May 02, 2026 5:42 am I was going to say this, I thought it’s ok for Rookies who haven’t signed yet to participate in Rookie mini camp, it’s training camp where they need to be signed. Remember last year Jack Bech and most of the 2nd round picks in the NFL hadn’t signed until training camp because the one guy who got drafted early in the 2nd was holding out. And Bech participated last year during Rookie camp, he was running drills.
And some on here went apeshit saying Bech was holding out which wasn't true.
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

Unread post by chucker »

Contract values are set by the CBA, but there are still some negotiating points like timing of bonus payments, so it's not surprising for some higher picks to take more time to sign a deal. They are protected financially in case of injury so they still participate without more risk than if they'd already signed their contract.
User avatar
RI RAIDER
Posts: 6,122
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
Has given High Fives: 968 times
Received High Fives: 535 times

Unread post by RI RAIDER »

Dr Death wrote: Sat May 02, 2026 6:06 am I think you are going to be disappointed... as are a few more on here. It's almost a lock that Cousins will start the season...IMO. I don't see that as a bad thing. I know some disagree with that, and I understand it. With both Kubiak and Brady stating they don't want a rookie starting the season, I think Cousins is as close to a lock as you will get for starting the season in this new regime.
I agree with what your saying. The question in my mind is how long does Cousins play. I think he wants to continue on in his career and does not want to give up playing (although I have no idea about that). Did he and Klint have conversations about this? I do not get the warm and fuzzy feeling about him desiring to be a teacher (again I have no idea about that and I am not knocking on him). I am scared that he is going to play longer than any of us expect.
These users gave a High Five to the author RI RAIDER for the post (total 2):
raidersince63, Dr Death
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Dr Death wrote: Sat May 02, 2026 6:06 am I think you are going to be disappointed... as are a few more on here. It's almost a lock that Cousins will start the season...IMO. I don't see that as a bad thing. I know some disagree with that, and I understand it. With both Kubiak and Brady stating they don't want a rookie starting the season, I think Cousins is as close to a lock as you will get for starting the season in this new regime.
Agreed...but I also understand there are sometimes fragile egos involved in this topic.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post (total 2):
RI RAIDER, LayneStaley
Post Reply