Raiders trade Tyree Wilson to Saints

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
DrDUne
Posts: 4,580
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Raiders trade Tyree Wilson to Saints

Unread post by DrDUne »

User avatar
JRaider17
Posts: 12,790
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 7 times
Received High Fives: 297 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

Best for both parties for a fresh start. I do think with the scheme change with Tonka and Lalulu making strides last year, it was going to be tougher for him to carve out a role.
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,632
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 188 times
Received High Fives: 495 times

Unread post by heavyD »

I won’t be surprised if at least initially he shows more than he did with the Raiders as the Saints will likely give him more snaps than he got with the Raiders but I don’t think we will look back at him as one that got away. It was a bad pick by as the guy was never worthy of a top 10 pick as Raiders management and scouts clearly missed with him.
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,103
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 106 times
Received High Fives: 574 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Jeevo wrote: Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:32 pm It wasn’t a crazy pick in any way at the time. Insane that he was highly rated after watching him play fir a few years.
Not sure I follow your thoughts: he was highly rated before the draft or highly rated once he was playing for the Raiders? Only a couple of posters here said he was good once we got a look at him with a supposedly fully healed foot. Certainly, for pro years 2 and 3 the foot was not an issue that we could see or heard about. Back to when he was drafted, yes he was a highly rated edge rusher but no way he should have gone that high in the draft. He had mostly positive traits coming out of college and was projected to be a first round pick. It is probably not fair to say he should have gone in the middle rounds of the draft, but on the other hand, with the foot injury and the obvious "slow off the mark" issues, I would have not drafted him at #7. It was not a great draft but there were options at #7; I wanted Gonzalez after Witherspoon was taken. Jack Campbell was also on my radar as I have wanted an impact LB forever. Several mocks has us taking the OL Skoronski. I was supportive on passing on Carter given what had just gone down with Ruggs.

1 Bryce Young Panthers QB Alabama
2 C.J. Stroud Texans QB Ohio State
3 Will Anderson Texans LB Alabama
4 Anthony Richardson Colts QB Florida
5 Devon Witherspoon Seahawks DB Illinois
6 Paris Johnson Cardinals T Ohio State
7 Tyree Wilson Raiders DE Texas Tech
8 Bijan Robinson Falcons RB Texas
9 Jalen Carter Eagles DT Georgia
10 Darnell Wright Bears T Tennessee
11 Peter Skoronski Titans G Northwestern
12 Jahmyr Gibbs Lions RB Alabama
13 Lukas Van Ness Packers DE Iowa
14 Broderick Jones Steelers T Georgia
15 Will McDonald Jets DE Iowa State
16 Emmanuel Forbes Commanders DB Mississippi State
17 Christian Gonzalez Patriots DB Oregon
18 Jack Campbell Lions LB Iowa
19 Calijah Kancey Buccaneers DT Pittsburgh
20 Jaxon Smith-Njigba Seahawks WR Ohio State
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

i was not a fan of this pick, wanted darnell wright or christian Gonzalez/devin witherspoon
User avatar
JRaider17
Posts: 12,790
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 7 times
Received High Fives: 297 times

Unread post by JRaider17 »

User avatar
Jeevo
Posts: 14,677
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Has given High Fives: 382 times
Received High Fives: 763 times

Unread post by Jeevo »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 9:57 am Not sure I follow your thoughts: he was highly rated before the draft or highly rated once he was playing for the Raiders? Only a couple of posters here said he was good once we got a look at him with a supposedly fully healed foot. Certainly, for pro years 2 and 3 the foot was not an issue that we could see or heard about. Back to when he was drafted, yes he was a highly rated edge rusher but no way he should have gone that high in the draft. He had mostly positive traits coming out of college and was projected to be a first round pick. It is probably not fair to say he should have gone in the middle rounds of the draft, but on the other hand, with the foot injury and the obvious "slow off the mark" issues, I would have not drafted him at #7. It was not a great draft but there were options at #7; I wanted Gonzalez after Witherspoon was taken. Jack Campbell was also on my radar as I have wanted an impact LB forever. Several mocks has us taking the OL Skoronski. I was supportive on passing on Carter given what had just gone down with Ruggs.

1 Bryce Young Panthers QB Alabama
2 C.J. Stroud Texans QB Ohio State
3 Will Anderson Texans LB Alabama
4 Anthony Richardson Colts QB Florida
5 Devon Witherspoon Seahawks DB Illinois
6 Paris Johnson Cardinals T Ohio State
7 Tyree Wilson Raiders DE Texas Tech
8 Bijan Robinson Falcons RB Texas
9 Jalen Carter Eagles DT Georgia
10 Darnell Wright Bears T Tennessee
11 Peter Skoronski Titans G Northwestern
12 Jahmyr Gibbs Lions RB Alabama
13 Lukas Van Ness Packers DE Iowa
14 Broderick Jones Steelers T Georgia
15 Will McDonald Jets DE Iowa State
16 Emmanuel Forbes Commanders DB Mississippi State
17 Christian Gonzalez Patriots DB Oregon
18 Jack Campbell Lions LB Iowa
19 Calijah Kancey Buccaneers DT Pittsburgh
20 Jaxon Smith-Njigba Seahawks WR Ohio State
Highly rated BEFORE the draft. Definitely not afterwards.
These users gave a High Five to the author Jeevo for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 9:57 am Not sure I follow your thoughts: he was highly rated before the draft or highly rated once he was playing for the Raiders? Only a couple of posters here said he was good once we got a look at him with a supposedly fully healed foot. Certainly, for pro years 2 and 3 the foot was not an issue that we could see or heard about. Back to when he was drafted, yes he was a highly rated edge rusher but no way he should have gone that high in the draft. He had mostly positive traits coming out of college and was projected to be a first round pick. It is probably not fair to say he should have gone in the middle rounds of the draft, but on the other hand, with the foot injury and the obvious "slow off the mark" issues, I would have not drafted him at #7. It was not a great draft but there were options at #7; I wanted Gonzalez after Witherspoon was taken. Jack Campbell was also on my radar as I have wanted an impact LB forever. Several mocks has us taking the OL Skoronski. I was supportive on passing on Carter given what had just gone down with Ruggs.

1 Bryce Young Panthers QB Alabama
2 C.J. Stroud Texans QB Ohio State
3 Will Anderson Texans LB Alabama
4 Anthony Richardson Colts QB Florida
5 Devon Witherspoon Seahawks DB Illinois
6 Paris Johnson Cardinals T Ohio State
7 Tyree Wilson Raiders DE Texas Tech
8 Bijan Robinson Falcons RB Texas
9 Jalen Carter Eagles DT Georgia
10 Darnell Wright Bears T Tennessee
11 Peter Skoronski Titans G Northwestern
12 Jahmyr Gibbs Lions RB Alabama
13 Lukas Van Ness Packers DE Iowa
14 Broderick Jones Steelers T Georgia
15 Will McDonald Jets DE Iowa State
16 Emmanuel Forbes Commanders DB Mississippi State
17 Christian Gonzalez Patriots DB Oregon
18 Jack Campbell Lions LB Iowa
19 Calijah Kancey Buccaneers DT Pittsburgh
20 Jaxon Smith-Njigba Seahawks WR Ohio State
I wanted to trade back 3 or 4 spots and draft Gonzalez. I thought 7 was too high for him. Ah well.
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post:
MexicanHulk
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,103
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 106 times
Received High Fives: 574 times

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Jeevo wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 12:37 pm Highly rated BEFORE the draft. Definitely not afterwards.
OK, makes sense. So scouts could see in college what we saw from day one as a Pro: slow "get off" and lack of progressing skills like hand-fighting and spin moves. I mean, the guy never changed in three years. A couple of times, he was lucky to run into some sacks and maybe 3 or 4 times I saw him actually shed a block and get the ball carrier. I did see that tight ends could usually handle him one-on-one. Not good for a top draft pick when they don't even have to assign an offensive tackle to block you.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post:
Jeevo
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

raider_kin wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 12:51 pm I wanted to trade back 3 or 4 spots and draft Gonzalez. I thought 7 was too high for him. Ah well.
i had gonzalez as the #1 cb in that draft with witherspoon a close second
These users gave a High Five to the author mstrbass2000 for the post (total 2):
raider_kin, MexicanHulk
User avatar
ELCAraiderfan
Posts: 2,673
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 317 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by ELCAraiderfan »

Jeevo wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 12:37 pm Highly rated BEFORE the draft. Definitely not afterwards.
I know a lot people had him highly rated but those people proved they don't know football.

All Tyree had was those measurables of his. But when you look at his tape anyone with good football knowledge could see he wasn't a player. Not for the 1st or 2nd rounds or 3rd imo. I wouldn't have taken a flyer on him at all and not till the 4th at best. I was hoping when the Raiders FO idiots that took him at 7 that year he would hopefully be able to be coached up with his raw physical gifts. But never happened.
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

ELCAraiderfan wrote: Tue Apr 28, 2026 4:40 pm I know a lot people had him highly rated but those people proved they don't know football.

All Tyree had was those measurables of his. But when you look at his tape anyone with good football knowledge could see he wasn't a player. Not for the 1st or 2nd rounds or 3rd imo. I wouldn't have taken a flyer on him at all and not till the 4th at best. I was hoping when the Raiders FO idiots that took him at 7 that year he would hopefully be able to be coached up with his raw physical gifts. But never happened.
So you're referring to all the scouts, mainstream talkers, all the people who rank the players?

He's gone now, so I don't really care, but no one thought The Raiders made a bad pick taking Wilson at 7.
These users gave a High Five to the author RickRyb for the post (total 5):
rcraider, raider_kin, Jeevo, Dr Death, Opoponax50
User avatar
UC__
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 8:49 pm
Has given High Fives: 71 times
Received High Fives: 7 times

Unread post by UC__ »

haji81872 wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 7:09 am NOBODY CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wonder if this guy realizes people avoid engaging with him more than the responses he gets. Kind of sad, really.
User avatar
raiders93
Posts: 4,998
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:34 pm
Has given High Fives: 7 times
Received High Fives: 172 times

Unread post by raiders93 »

RunOverByHubbard wrote: Mon Apr 27, 2026 1:31 pm OK, makes sense. So scouts could see in college what we saw from day one as a Pro: slow "get off" and lack of progressing skills like hand-fighting and spin moves. I mean, the guy never changed in three years. A couple of times, he was lucky to run into some sacks and maybe 3 or 4 times I saw him actually shed a block and get the ball carrier. I did see that tight ends could usually handle him one-on-one. Not good for a top draft pick when they don't even have to assign an offensive tackle to block you.
looking back his scouting report looks unrealistically optimistic about everything except his wingspan. The get off - easy fix. The lack of spatial awareness or football IQ? No problem. The lack of explosiveness and lateral agility? All good hell do some ladder work. The part where he literally has no moves to speak of? He can be taught.

But by god… have you seen those pterodactyl arms?? You can’t teach that
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

This gave me a chuckle. Moleasses’ 2025 highlight reel. All the best plays were during our final game vs. the ordered-to-lose Chiefs.

User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 577 times
Received High Fives: 645 times

Unread post by Viper »

At the time it was perceived the 7th spot was too rich for Gonzalez. Always easy to look back and say he should have been the pick, but damn, that kid sure would have solved a problem for us in a big way.
These users gave a High Five to the author Viper for the post:
raider_kin
Post Reply