2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Choose a second rounder

Poll ended at Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:19 am

CB: McCoy
1
2%
CB: Terrell
0
No votes
DT: McDonald
32
48%
DT: Miller
3
5%
OL: Pregnon
11
17%
OL: Bisontis
3
5%
WR: Boston
9
14%
WR: Bernard
0
No votes
MISC: Other
7
11%
Total votes: 66

User avatar
Xramfan
Posts: 17,923
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:01 pm
Has given High Fives: 682 times
Received High Fives: 1279 times

2026 Draft: Rounds 2-3 Friday 4/7pm

Unread post by Xramfan »

Who do we want?

Discuss
These users gave a High Five to the author Xramfan for the post:
GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Sir Raider Duck, OMS
Posts: 10,487
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:58 pm
Location: The Principality of Sealand
Has given High Fives: 302 times
Received High Fives: 280 times

Unread post by Sir Raider Duck, OMS »

Roll Tide Raider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:32 pm Traded back to let the Texans draft the NT we needed, then reached for a safety. We will be the best 3-4 defense to ever play the scheme without a nose tackle.
Obviously, Spytek and Leonard didn't think McDonald was all that. No need to panic.
These users gave a High Five to the author Sir Raider Duck, OMS for the post (total 4):
ALLRAIDERWORLD21, raider_kin, raiderboyron, Willmark
User avatar
vtraider
Posts: 7,868
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Pigeon forge Tennessee
Has given High Fives: 34 times
Received High Fives: 342 times

Unread post by vtraider »

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:32 pm Wonder when the 3rd QB will go & who it’ll be?

I’m thinking Carson Beck in the 3rd

Also wonder if we’ll draft another young QB to battle it out with AOC for the 3rd QB slot
Maybe in the seventh. Which i wouldn't be opposed to. Aiden is a free agent next year anyways. So going to need some kind of backup
User avatar
ELCAraiderfan
Posts: 2,673
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 317 times
Received High Fives: 125 times

Unread post by ELCAraiderfan »

The draft in Pittsburg looks boring as f[raiders_icon]ck. But the entertainment in here from keyboard wannabe nfl gm's is damn funny and entertaining.
These users gave a High Five to the author ELCAraiderfan for the post (total 5):
skullnbonz, SkullCrusher, raider_kin, rcraider, raiderboyron
User avatar
Raider4Ever
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: Midwest
Has given High Fives: 105 times
Received High Fives: 5 times

Unread post by Raider4Ever »

Roll Tide Raider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:32 pm Traded back to let the Texans draft the NT we needed, then reached for a safety. We will be the best 3-4 defense to ever play the scheme without a nose tackle.
Yupppp...season starts tomorrow, so we're royally screwed.

Btw, ur legendary coach Saban was all this dude's jock.
User avatar
Roll Tide Raider
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:26 am
Has given High Fives: 14 times
Received High Fives: 21 times

Unread post by Roll Tide Raider »

Raider4Ever wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:39 pm Yupppp...season starts tomorrow, so we're royally screwed.

Btw, ur legendary coach Saban was all this dude's jock.
Great response. Bravo.
These users gave a High Five to the author Roll Tide Raider for the post:
Raider4Ever
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Roll Tide Raider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:32 pm Traded back to let the Texans draft the NT we needed, then reached for a safety. We will be the best 3-4 defense to ever play the scheme without a nose tackle.
Yup...after only 2 picks, our draft and our season and our future is doomed. SMH.
User avatar
Roll Tide Raider
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:26 am
Has given High Fives: 14 times
Received High Fives: 21 times

Unread post by Roll Tide Raider »

Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:38 pm Obviously, Spytek and Leonard didn't think McDonald was all that. No need to panic.
Very well could be. I just saw a lot more potential free safeties available later in the draft than nose tackle. Nose tackle is a big need in the defensive scheme we're running and we just can't plug some shlub in there and expect to keep blockers off our linebackers. That's my line of thinking.
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

Roll Tide Raider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:32 pm Traded back to let the Texans draft the NT we needed, then reached for a safety. We will be the best 3-4 defense to ever play the scheme without a nose tackle.
Yeah we need a NT but the position is deep so there is time to vet our guy, as much as i’m a trenches guy i’ll say safety was as big a need as NT

We didn't reach for a safety we took a 2nd round guy in the second round

If i was you stay away from bridges if you get you knicker in this much of a twist about not drafting the guy you wanted
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post (total 3):
raidersince63, mstrbass2000, Raider4Ever
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Roll Tide Raider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:41 pm Great response. Bravo.
One deserves another.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
Raider4Ever
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

Lots and lots of good wr.left, good guards left too,cb
User avatar
Viper
Posts: 1,549
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 577 times
Received High Fives: 645 times

Unread post by Viper »

Roll Tide Raider wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:43 pm Very well could be. I just saw a lot more potential free safeties available later in the draft than nose tackle. Nose tackle is a big need in the defensive scheme we're running and we just can't plug some shlub in there and expect to keep blockers off our linebackers. That's my line of thinking.
We definitely need a DT but I believe there are more quality ones than in the secondary. I’m typically a trenches guy but we need both.
User avatar
mstrbass2000
Posts: 866
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2026 10:49 am
Has given High Fives: 337 times
Received High Fives: 364 times

Unread post by mstrbass2000 »

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:43 pm Yeah we need a NT but the position is deep so there is time to vet our guy, as much as i’m a trenches guy i’ll say safety was as big a need as NT

We didn't reach for a safety we took a 2nd round guy in the second round

If i was you stay away from bridges if you get you knicker in this much of a twist about not drafting the guy you wanted
I agree we got 2 3rd and lots of good players left
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

If McNeil-Warren is there at 67 I wonder of we would double dip at Safety

Stukes & McNeil-Warren would be a hell of a combo

The meltdown would go into overload if that happens

If we don’t go OL tonight at all then the Samaritan's phone lines are gonna be overloaded with Raiders fans :bawling: :bawling:
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:38 pm Obviously, Spytek and Leonard didn't think McDonald was all that. No need to panic.
I have it on good authority that there are those in this forum who believe they are more qualified than Spytek and Leonard
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post (total 6):
raidersince63, Sir Raider Duck, OMS, raider_kin, skullnbonz, ELCAraiderfan, RickRyb
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

CWood24 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 5:43 pm Yeah we need a NT but the position is deep so there is time to vet our guy, as much as i’m a trenches guy i’ll say safety was as big a need as NT

We didn't reach for a safety we took a 2nd round guy in the second round

If i was you stay away from bridges if you get you knicker in this much of a twist about not drafting the guy you wanted
^^^This...I've got a gig ass bowl of popcorn and I'm munching and laughing at some of the carnage.
Post Reply