Inside Grudens 2nd regime
- ALLRAIDERWORLD21
- Posts: 3,890
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 434 times
- Received High Fives: 566 times
Inside Grudens 2nd regime
Since we have two weeks to the draft, here's something spicy to talk about-- A detailed article in the Athletic via NY Times that just confirms what most already suspected..Good read on Grudens 2nd go around with the Raiders..The reddit version gets you past the paywall..
https://www.reddit.com/r/raiders/s/IznwwLXEZH
https://www.reddit.com/r/raiders/s/IznwwLXEZH
- These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
- Oaktown Superman
- raider_kin
- Posts: 3,663
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2132 times
- Received High Fives: 908 times
Arnette in prison yet? Here's hoping.Attyla wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 1:37 pm I think the intent was to convert him to a safety. He was just another bad pick. If you read the article, you read where Gruden tanked film intentionally when he did not want a guy. No wonder he was epically bad. As bad as the old man was at times, he gave Gruden a pretty good lineup. He made it even better for Callahan. Too bad it did not pay off.
- These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post (total 2):
- nitroraider, Attyla
- Dr Death
- Posts: 3,729
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
- Has given High Fives: 3767 times
- Received High Fives: 890 times
My opinion of Gruden: I think he is a good coach.... if that's all he has on his plate. He's not a great coach (way too conservative for me). He is a terrible judge of talent and should never have had the control that Mark gave him. I didn't want him back. Second go 'rounds never work out.
Conclusion: I like Gruden but... keep him away from my Raiders going forward.
Conclusion: I like Gruden but... keep him away from my Raiders going forward.
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
He was a good coach if you were a veteran in the second half of your career. He was garbage if you were a rookie. He taught you exactly jack shit. Reading that article floored me. To think he was using film to show all the bad plays a prospect had if he did not want a player. Dear God how in the literal f[raiders_icon]ck he kept his job after all the shit in that article is beyond me.Dr Death wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 6:26 am My opinion of Gruden: I think he is a good coach.... if that's all he has on his plate. He's not a great coach (way too conservative for me). He is a terrible judge of talent and should never have had the control that Mark gave him. I didn't want him back. Second go 'rounds never work out.
Conclusion: I like Gruden but... keep him away from my Raiders going forward.![]()
- Dr Death
- Posts: 3,729
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
- Has given High Fives: 3767 times
- Received High Fives: 890 times
I didn't read the article. I just went with what I saw when he was here.
I couldn't access the article for some reason when it was posted. I seem to be able to now. I will read it... maybe It will change my mind.
I couldn't access the article for some reason when it was posted. I seem to be able to now. I will read it... maybe It will change my mind.
- Dr Death
- Posts: 3,729
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
- Has given High Fives: 3767 times
- Received High Fives: 890 times
So I read the article. It's pretty damning. I wasn't aware of all that went on. I still don't think he could evaluate talent worth a shit. The article just confirmed what most of us already knew. 
- BoKnows81
- Posts: 6,999
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 963 times
- Received High Fives: 2276 times
This thread is almost as irrelevant as the Aidan O'Connell thread lol
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
The article shed some light on what was going on behind the scenes. If there ever was a more flawed coach, I do not know who it would be. I think we have seen incompetent coaches, but the guy wielded ultimate power because Doofus had his man crush and thought he was untouchable. And once the emails were released, he found out the league.....Dr Death wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:04 am So I read the article. It's pretty damning. I wasn't aware of all that went on. I still don't think he could evaluate talent worth a shit. The article just confirmed what most of us already knew.![]()
For better or worse
- Oaktown Superman
- Posts: 3,019
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 621 times
- Received High Fives: 252 times
Sad to read, but reality isn’t always sunny.ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 8:12 am Since we have two weeks to the draft, here's something spicy to talk about-- A detailed article in the Athletic via NY Times that just confirms what most already suspected..Good read on Grudens 2nd go around with the Raiders..The reddit version gets you past the paywall..
https://www.reddit.com/r/raiders/s/IznwwLXEZH
- Oaktown Superman
- Posts: 3,019
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 621 times
- Received High Fives: 252 times
I’d call it a push.Attyla wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 9:48 am I will pose the question, is the Doofus era literally as bad as the post Super Bowl years under the Old Man? I know we went to the playoff twice under Doofus but after reading this article, and I do not doubt the validity of the it, are both guys equally that bad as owners?
- Rainman56
- Posts: 12,428
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
- Location: Underground
- Has given High Fives: 468 times
- Received High Fives: 278 times
Look who he decided to stick with at QB no matter what when Brady was all but a done deal until Gruden pulled the plug. TellsRaiderandBulldog wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 11:07 pm Nothing here we didn’t already know.
Look at who he picked at 4th in the 1st in the 2019 draft.
all we need to know
- These users gave a High Five to the author Rainman56 for the post (total 2):
- Hellbound, GoodTimeCharlie
- Oaktown Superman
- Posts: 3,019
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:02 am
- Has given High Fives: 621 times
- Received High Fives: 252 times
I remember hearing Chuckles say he was glad Leatherwood fell to them. Sadly, I truly think he believed that.ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 12:11 pm The fact that they had two separate draft boards is wild, Gruden and the coaches on one side, Mayock and the scouts on the other. Sources saying Gruden wasn’t even around on Day 3 pretty much confirm that Mayock was behind picks like Maxx, Hunter Renfrow, and Nate Hobbs.
Mayock was clearly a strong talent evaluator, his issue wasn’t scouting, it was running the front office, according to sources.
Then you’ve got Gruden’s “kill tapes,” where he’d cut together negative plays to discredit prospects the scouts liked. He also gave Tom Cable heavy influence, which led to picks like Alex Leatherwood.
And per sources they panicked and botched the first-round trade-down and still ended up taking Clelin Ferrell.
- Toast
- Posts: 2,707
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
- Has given High Fives: 554 times
- Received High Fives: 1004 times
I never could quite figure out why Gruden's teams always faded in December. I always thought that the 2000 team was our best chance, that was a fun season to watch.
- BoKnows81
- Posts: 6,999
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
- Has given High Fives: 963 times
- Received High Fives: 2276 times
f[raiders_icon]cking Alex Leatherwood just another Alabama lineman bust. That pick scarred me. One of the reasons I want no parts of Proctor.
- RaiderandBulldog
- Posts: 15,972
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
- Location: Fresno Ca
- Has given High Fives: 228 times
- Received High Fives: 383 times
Gruden grinds his team into the ground.Toast wrote: Sun Apr 12, 2026 4:01 pm I never could quite figure out why Gruden's teams always faded in December. I always thought that the 2000 team was our best chance, that was a fun season to watch.
It is not an accident imo that we made the playoffs in 2021 after he was forced out.