NFLPA report card - Facilities + coaches graded

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

NFLPA report card - Facilities + coaches graded

Unread post by chucker »

The NFL won the legal battle to prevent the NFLPA from releasing results of their report cards to the public but, predictably, they've been successfully leaked. The Raiders got A's in almost everything. They got a B in travel - a category where a B wasn't bad. They got bad grades across the board for coaching, with OC receiving an F. Ownership got an A. Interestingly, the Steelers with the media-favorite Rooneys got one of the worst ownership grades.

Someone has compiled all the grades into a google sheet:
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

raidersince63 wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 5:32 am But only Raider players know about how approachable Mark is and the Raider players are not the only ones who voted. So logically, how would the players of the other 31 know to vote that resulted in Mark getting such a good grade, and our OC getting such a bad grade?

And when we first learned that Kelly got the OC job, most of us were giddy with praise for the move. But as time goes on, I'm thinking more and more that the problem wasn't as much with Kelly but instead with Pete.

But of course, we'll probably never know for sure what went on behind the scenes.
I think those two grades are being graded for your team, not other teams. So our players graded Davis, the Steelers graded Rooney and so forth. As for Kelly, yea, many of us were happy but the players apparently thought he was a clown show.
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

Unread post by chucker »

I'm pretty sure the surveys only allow players to grade the aspects of their own team in each category. It would be pretty worthless if players could grade other teams' characteristics that they aren't really familiar with.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post (total 2):
Attyla, GoodTimeCharlie
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

chucker wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 6:20 am I'm pretty sure the surveys only allow players to grade the aspects of their own team in each category. It would be pretty worthless if players could grade other teams' characteristics that they aren't really familiar with.
We graded out in every aspect at various levels of "A" except for every aspect that was directly controlled by Carroll. I will be curious to see the grades next year. All of the grades not controlled by Kubiak should stay in the same range, so we are about to learn how good we did with this hire this time next year.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
SkullCrusher
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

The Davis grade absolutely makes sense. We know he sucks at football decisions but he is approachable and seems to genuinely like and respect his players. Many owners see their players as servants beneath them.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
chucker
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 5:54 am I think those two grades are being graded for your team, not other teams. So our players graded Davis, the Steelers graded Rooney and so forth. As for Kelly, yea, many of us were happy but the players apparently thought he was a clown show.
OK, I stand corrected...that is something I was not aware of. I thought it was every team voting on every team. Probably shoulda read the entire article...my bad.
chucker wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 6:20 am I'm pretty sure the surveys only allow players to grade the aspects of their own team in each category. It would be pretty worthless if players could grade other teams' characteristics that they aren't really familiar with.
Gotcha, that makes much more sense now. And I will self-sentence myself to wearing a Chiefs jersey for the rest if the day ! :grin:
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

raidersince63 wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 6:50 am OK, I stand corrected...that is something I was not aware of. I thought it was every team voting on every team. Probably shoulda read the entire article...my bad.



Gotcha, that makes much more sense now. And I will self-sentence myself to wearing a Cheifs jersey for the rest if the day ! :grin:
no worries, and it does not happen unless there is photographic evidence
User avatar
raidersince63
Posts: 1,692
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
Has given High Fives: 925 times
Received High Fives: 656 times

Unread post by raidersince63 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Feb 28, 2026 6:51 am no worries, and it does not happen unless there is photographic evidence
Done, this is me wearing Freddy's jersey !


image.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
These users gave a High Five to the author raidersince63 for the post:
Attyla
Post Reply