The Defensive Coordinator Thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
Be_Easy_25
Posts: 5,488
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 9:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 40 times
Received High Fives: 101 times

The Defensive Coordinator Thread

Unread post by Be_Easy_25 »

Jim Schwartz available?
User avatar
Marzan
Posts: 2,859
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 12:39 pm
Has given High Fives: 141 times
Received High Fives: 134 times

Unread post by Marzan »

Raidernation1979 wrote: Tue Feb 03, 2026 10:44 am
Damnit, don't give me hope. Getting Kubiak and Schwartz in the same offseason would be too much of a good thing.

Karl Scott is a name I've read a couple of times from the 'insiders'
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,632
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 188 times
Received High Fives: 495 times

Unread post by heavyD »

Looks like the Browns are determined to wrestle with the Jets for least desirable destination. Holding a coach hostage is likely going to bring pause to any potential candidates for other positions. Maybe it's a strategy to get a team to trade a pick for him but nothing screams dysfunction than forcing a DC to stay on staff that doesn't want to be there. Ideally the DC would have some experience with Kubiak being a rookie head coach it's more ideal to surround him with some experienced coordinators especially ones that may have served as HC in the past.
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

Unread post by chucker »

User avatar
Raidernation1979
Posts: 8,065
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 385 times
Received High Fives: 882 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

A breakdown of Mike Macdonalds defense works.

User avatar
Trainnvain
Posts: 1,392
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
Has given High Fives: 240 times
Received High Fives: 160 times

Unread post by Trainnvain »


It seems things will not work out well for Shwarz in Cleveland
User avatar
DanKD
Posts: 3,225
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
Has given High Fives: 39 times
Received High Fives: 1090 times

Unread post by DanKD »

Im going to predict Monken is the biggest flame out of this years coaches. Theres just no reason to passive aggressively insult your own staff upon taking the job in a public way.
These users gave a High Five to the author DanKD for the post:
Trainnvain
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Throw Cle a 7th rounder for Schwartz if Kubiak wants him. I think an experienced DC would be good with a first time HC
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

Unread post by chucker »

There's some misinformation out there, even from well-meaning people who might seem like credible sources. Q said on his podcast that we could hire Arden Durde from Seattle and they couldn't block it because it would be a "promotion" because he would go from not calling plays with Seattle to calling plays with the Raiders. That's not how it works. He has the DC title so they could block any move other than to a HC position. It's possible they would not block him from the opportunity, but that would be MacDonald's decision to make.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
skullnbonz
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

chucker wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:14 am There's some misinformation out there, even from well-meaning people who might seem like credible sources. Q said on his podcast that we could hire Arden Durde from Seattle and they couldn't block it because it would be a "promotion" because he would go from not calling plays with Seattle to calling plays with the Raiders. That's not how it works. He has the DC title so they could block any move other than to a HC position. It's possible they would not block him from the opportunity, but that would be MacDonald's decision to make.
Agreed, having that job title is the decider. Not the actual job function.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
skullnbonz
User avatar
heavyD
Posts: 8,632
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:59 am
Has given High Fives: 188 times
Received High Fives: 495 times

Unread post by heavyD »

How many DC openings are left? If Schwartz wants to work as DC next season, his options are thinner at this stage of the hiring cycle.
User avatar
BotesBoats
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 45 times
Received High Fives: 99 times

Unread post by BotesBoats »

heavyD wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:55 am How many DC openings are left? If Schwartz wants to work as DC next season, his options are thinner at this stage of the hiring cycle.
3 I think. Arizona, us and the Browns (once he leaves)

We've got a pretty darn good chance I'd say.
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

BotesBoats wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 10:38 am 3 I think. Arizona, us and the Browns (once he leaves)

We've got a pretty darn good chance I'd say.
So two, since the browns don't count. Anyway, the only thing that matters is who does Kubiak want. He may not want a former Head Coach there looking over his shoulder.
These users gave a High Five to the author RickRyb for the post:
Raider4Ever
User avatar
BotesBoats
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 45 times
Received High Fives: 99 times

Unread post by BotesBoats »

I mean on one hand, it would be nice for a first year HC to have an reliable autonomous counterpart running your defense, he wouldnt have to worry about that side of the ball, or micromanage anything.

On the other hand, he could be gone in a year if he gets a head coaching job.
User avatar
skullnbonz
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2025 5:55 am
Has given High Fives: 44 times
Received High Fives: 15 times

Unread post by skullnbonz »

BotesBoats wrote: Wed Feb 04, 2026 12:08 pm I mean on one hand, it would be nice for a first year HC to have an reliable autonomous counterpart running your defense, he wouldnt have to worry about that side of the ball, or micromanage anything.

On the other hand, he could be gone in a year if he gets a head coaching job.
If he leaves after a year to become a head coach it is because he had an excellent year as DC. That’s a good thing
These users gave a High Five to the author skullnbonz for the post:
heavyD
User avatar
Goodtimes333
Posts: 1,098
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2023 12:04 pm
Has given High Fives: 1218 times
Received High Fives: 448 times

Unread post by Goodtimes333 »

I'd like a DC who isn't a stubborn ass. The Pats under Bill B were quoted as saying that they don't run a set scheme. They have 16 defenses for 16 weeks of the season, etc. Each and every week they would adapt and run a new variation. If a team struggled against press man, zone, blitz, pattern match zone, odd or even front, stunts, etc that's what they would do. They would force an offense to beat them in a way the offense couldn't beat others prior. That's the way. I say this because many coordinators are dead set on running things one way. Adaptability is key. Especially on defense with modern rules, disadvantages, and variety of different modern offenses.

This requires: both a non stubborn mind & a good teacher, intelligent & disciplined defensive players. Not an easy task
These users gave a High Five to the author Goodtimes333 for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, Xramfan
Post Reply