Pick a GM

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!

Pick a GM

Reggie
8
38%
Mayock
3
14%
Ziegler
0
No votes
Telescope
4
19%
Spytek
6
29%
Total votes: 21

User avatar
The Real CK
Posts: 17,271
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 1158 times
Received High Fives: 458 times

Pick a GM

Unread post by The Real CK »

:grin:
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

CWood24 wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:11 am This is basically i hate the fact we didn't sign Darnold so i hate the GM… oh & let’s make some shit up as well to make my narrative sound good
The next draft for me is where we need to see an impact in the line and at QB

We see that, I am good with things. You don't build a team in a season and every GM is going to have their hits and misses, and fans are never going to be happy across the board. Telesco got Bowers, to me the biggest no brainer pick ever. So now Telesco is a god and Spytek did not get Darnold so he is shit.
User avatar
Dr Death
Posts: 3,729
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2024 10:51 am
Has given High Fives: 3767 times
Received High Fives: 890 times

Unread post by Dr Death »

CWood24 wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:11 am This is basically i hate the fact we didn't sign Darnold so i hate the GM… oh & let’s make some shit up as well to make my narrative sound good
Not sure who you're responding to but..... I didn't hate not signing Darnold at all. I didn't hate signing Geno. Either are better than what we had.
These users gave a High Five to the author Dr Death for the post:
FLORIDARAYDAH
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

Attyla wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:23 am The next draft for me is where we need to see an impact in the line and at QB

We see that, I am good with things. You don't build a team in a season and every GM is going to have their hits and misses, and fans are never going to be happy across the board. Telesco got Bowers, to me the biggest no brainer pick ever. So now Telesco is a god and Spytek did not get Darnold so he is shit.
It makes no sense to me that Telesco gets the credit for Bowers from the same guys who give Mckenzie no credit for draft Mack, if you give Telesco credit for Bowers then does Spytek not get credit for Jeanty

I wasn’t against Telesco staying but I remember when we signed him they hated it saying he couldn't draft even when you put the proof in front of them now there all claiming he is a god

I agree QB & OL are the biggest issues on this team going forward not that Geno can’t be good but we need a young talented QB of the future as you can’t win the lottery if you don't play, i’m willing to give Spytek another draft with his people in place to see what he can magic up
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
Attyla
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

Dr Death wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:24 am Not sure who you're responding to but..... I didn't hate not signing Darnold at all. I didn't hate signing Geno. Either are better than what we had.
Wasn’t aimed at you.

I was the same way although i did think our OL was improving but obviously not
These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post:
Dr Death
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

Attyla wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:23 am The next draft for me is where we need to see an impact in the line and at QB
With this clown show drafting?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown:
User avatar
GoodTimeCharlie
Posts: 4,584
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
Location: Atop the commode
Has given High Fives: 1483 times
Received High Fives: 1350 times

Unread post by GoodTimeCharlie »

raider_kin wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 5:21 pm With this clown show drafting?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown:
Oh dude. You went full Bono. Never go full Bono.
These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 3):
FLORIDARAYDAH, rcraider, Willmark
User avatar
Pseudoscot
Posts: 863
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:42 am
Received High Fives: 23 times

Unread post by Pseudoscot »

A Sophie's Choice of ineptitude.

Had to think hard about this but eventually went with Reggie. We all know he had his weaknesses and I'm not saying he was a great GM by any stretch of the imagination but he did do this:

- Sorted out a cap situation which was truly in the shit
- Found a starting level qb
- Put together a functional oline (The Osemele years were so much fun to watch and Penn was a great pickup)
- Drafted a generational talent in Mack
- Actually got us into the playoffs

I don't think any of the other GM's have as many positives.

Mayock - hamstrung by having Gruden's fingerprints all over the top end of the draft. Did find Maxx but the AB pickup failed badly.
Ziegler - can't separate him from McTwat. Dismantled a roster and failed utterly to rebuild it.
Telesco - picked Bowers, arguably the best player in that draft. Gave all the money to Wilkins, this should have been a great FA signing. It wasn't.
Spytek - Too early to make a judgement.
These users gave a High Five to the author Pseudoscot for the post (total 3):
raider_kin, Dr Death, The Real CK
User avatar
raider_kin
Posts: 3,663
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
Has given High Fives: 2132 times
Received High Fives: 908 times

Unread post by raider_kin »

GoodTimeCharlie wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 6:06 pm Oh dude. You went full Bono. Never go full Bono.
Pissed off about the idiot American Ryder cup team, absolute pussies. And a little drunk. Ah well...
These users gave a High Five to the author raider_kin for the post (total 3):
GoodTimeCharlie, Dr Death, The Real CK
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

raider_kin wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 5:21 pm With this clown show drafting?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown:
we had one draft with this group. I think they hit on more than a few picks.

You are way way overreacting
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

raider_kin wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 5:21 pm With this clown show drafting?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown: :clown:
You keep whinging about losing a draft pick wouldn’t that make you happy we have one less pick to use for the “clown show” as you call them

Lets be honest Telesco draft wasn’t great

Bowers & JPJ were easy no brainer picks so he gets no credit like Reggie with Mack

Glaze has been awful this year

Devonshire & Taylor aren’t on the roster

Richardson, Laube & Eichenberg have done nothing of note for us
User avatar
The Real CK
Posts: 17,271
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 1158 times
Received High Fives: 458 times

Unread post by The Real CK »

CWood24 wrote: Sun Sep 28, 2025 3:01 pm You keep whinging about losing a draft pick wouldn’t that make you happy we have one less pick to use for the “clown show” as you call them

Lets be honest Telesco draft wasn’t great

Bowers & JPJ were easy no brainer picks so he gets no credit like Reggie with Mack

Glaze has been awful this year

Devonshire & Taylor aren’t on the roster

Richardson, Laube & Eichenberg have done nothing of note for us
If those were no-brainer picks, other GMs would have drafted them. Removing credit for making the right decision is asinine. Reggie and Telesco, in that instance, didn't overthink it.
User avatar
Sloth_Fratelli
Posts: 1,289
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 574 times
Received High Fives: 226 times

Unread post by Sloth_Fratelli »

Attyla wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 4:24 am I doubt about 80% of this post is reality
Cuz you’re a jock sniffer like Mark.

The report is out there, you can google Brady says no to Darnold. You realize that Brady is tight with the Minnesota coach right?

But hey we are in good hands. Look at Seattle they really regret losing Geno/Pete & signing Darnold
These users gave a High Five to the author Sloth_Fratelli for the post (total 2):
The Real CK, FlyBono24
User avatar
Sloth_Fratelli
Posts: 1,289
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 574 times
Received High Fives: 226 times

Unread post by Sloth_Fratelli »

Attyla wrote: Sat Sep 27, 2025 11:23 am The next draft for me is where we need to see an impact in the line and at QB

We see that, I am good with things. You don't build a team in a season and every GM is going to have their hits and misses, and fans are never going to be happy across the board. Telesco got Bowers, to me the biggest no brainer pick ever. So now Telesco is a god and Spytek did not get Darnold so he is shit.
Yeah I never said he is God. Over exaggerating someone’ else’s points tells me you can’t debate.

Tell me something why didn’t Brady’s puppet could’ve addressed the OL/QB this last draft. All he did was trade down and accumulate picks, while taking a luxury pick in the top 5 & a slot WR in the 2nd round.

Now compare that to what the Giants did & tell me who’s setup better?

We have the same needs as last year that are in vital positions but you have to tell yourself that Brady’s boy is doing a good job.
These users gave a High Five to the author Sloth_Fratelli for the post (total 2):
The Real CK, FlyBono24
User avatar
The Real CK
Posts: 17,271
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: "Only losers qualify for comeback wins."
Has given High Fives: 1158 times
Received High Fives: 458 times

Unread post by The Real CK »

Sloth_Fratelli wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 6:04 am Yeah I never said he is God. Over exaggerating someone’ else’s points tells me you can’t debate.

Tell me something why didn’t Brady’s puppet could’ve addressed the OL/QB this last draft. All he did was trade down and accumulate picks, while taking a luxury pick in the top 5 & a slot WR in the 2nd round.

Now compare that to what the Giants did & tell me who’s setup better?

We have the same needs as last year that are in vital positions but you have to tell yourself that Brady’s boy is doing a good job.
It is his shtick.

The Giants have some nice, young pieces. They need to fire Daboll and find a coach to maximize those pieces.

Meanwhile, we decided to hire Depends, trade for and extend his 34-year-old boy toy, not beef up the O-Line and let Depends' Nepo Baby run it, and draft a slot WR in the second round who barely plays.
These users gave a High Five to the author The Real CK for the post:
FlyBono24
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Sloth_Fratelli wrote: Mon Sep 29, 2025 5:57 am Cuz you’re a jock sniffer like Mark.

The report is out there, you can google Brady says no to Darnold. You realize that Brady is tight with the Minnesota coach right?

But hey we are in good hands. Look at Seattle they really regret losing Geno/Pete & signing Darnold
first, quit the insults.

Second, that was not part of the 80% you made up. I know what Brady said.
Post Reply