Bosa has an ACL - trade Maxx to the 49ers?

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,103
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 106 times
Received High Fives: 574 times

Bosa has an ACL - trade Maxx to the 49ers?

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Someone posted in a thread after our loss that we should trade Maxx Crosby for a bunch of (needed) draft picks, thereby increasing our odds of picking at or near the top of the draft in 2026. As we all know, the 49ers just lost a key player on their defense -- after Fred Warner he is their most important defensive player -- and their d-line is not that deep and full of young players. And, the 49ers are in first place in the NFC West and will likely be battling for a playoff spot this season.

At first blush, I am against trading the best player we have drafted in what 25 years. But, in my frustration with the whole damn thing, I am thinking about this. The trade deadline is early November, so you likely will want to see if Carroll and staff can get this bad act together, but unless we start looking a lot better, there will be talk of trades and even, gasp, "tanking." Thoughts?
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Two 1sts minimum and I'm for it. I was for it last year.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 3):
Dr Death, raider_kin, RenoRaider
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:17 am Two 1sts minimum and I'm for it. I was for it last year.
dead money would be an issue. 10M this year and 5M next. Cap savings are good but you are also giving up on your best player on defense.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

That's not the way forward it could also be a low first rounders to. Do the 9'ers have cap room to make this move?

I get confused as some feel we should have got Micah at high cost, but now want to trade Maxx. On top of that we're on schedule for that 6-7 wins most predicted. It really feels like that a lot of middle age men are still very emotional and have wild player thoughts based on last game. You can't run a team that way. The only way I would trade him is if he's ready to give up on the Raiders.

The only thing under performing expectations is the oline, which was thought of as mid before the season, at best.
These users gave a High Five to the author SkullCrusher for the post:
LayneStaley
User avatar
EaglevShark
Posts: 839
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:22 pm
Location: Arts District, Los Angeles
Has given High Fives: 123 times
Received High Fives: 28 times

Unread post by EaglevShark »

I’d be for it for his sake and the Raiders.
By the time this team has a quality QB and OL Maxx will be past his prime.
Im making a huge assumption in the second sentence.
These users gave a High Five to the author EaglevShark for the post (total 2):
RenoRaider, Opoponax50
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

Would be odd to hire a 74 year old coach and then trade our best player for picks that wouldn’t even completely convey until 2027. Brady and the new hires would basically be saying we give up less than 25% into the season. I doubt that happens.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
Rabidraider
User avatar
Rainman56
Posts: 12,428
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:28 pm
Location: Underground
Has given High Fives: 468 times
Received High Fives: 278 times

Unread post by Rainman56 »

Only if he takes his podcast with him.
These users gave a High Five to the author Rainman56 for the post (total 5):
The Real CK, Sloth_Fratelli, Rabidraider, RenoRaider, Opoponax50
User avatar
CWood24
Posts: 3,970
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
Has given High Fives: 15 times
Received High Fives: 365 times

Unread post by CWood24 »

2 1st’s & maybe some change then maybe

You could sort out the QB, OL & replacement DE with 3 1st round pick or at the very least 2 of those position

If Wilson had worked out then it would be a no braider
User avatar
Hellbound
Posts: 6,432
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:21 am
Has given High Fives: 549 times
Received High Fives: 808 times

Unread post by Hellbound »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:17 am Two 1sts minimum and I'm for it. I was for it last year.
I mean we can win 4 games with him or without him
These users gave a High Five to the author Hellbound for the post (total 5):
Sloth_Fratelli, Dr Death, RenoRaider, EaglevShark, Opoponax50
User avatar
BoKnows81
Posts: 6,999
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:36 am
Has given High Fives: 963 times
Received High Fives: 2276 times

Unread post by BoKnows81 »

Hellbound wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 11:57 am I mean we can win 4 games with him or without him
Yep. Might as well get Maxx value for him now. I think we need to come to the realization that by the time we're relevant again, he will be beyond washed.
These users gave a High Five to the author BoKnows81 for the post (total 2):
Dr Death, RenoRaider
User avatar
Sloth_Fratelli
Posts: 1,289
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:43 pm
Has given High Fives: 574 times
Received High Fives: 226 times

Unread post by Sloth_Fratelli »

BoKnows81 wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:17 am Two 1sts minimum and I'm for it. I was for it last year.
Me too….but i want a real GM making picks with a new staff
User avatar
Corleone
Posts: 20,573
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Has given High Fives: 257 times
Received High Fives: 1111 times
Contact:

Unread post by Corleone »

I really doubt Maxx has the value that some of you think he does. Two firsts is a pipe dream.
These users gave a High Five to the author Corleone for the post (total 3):
The Real CK, heavyD, 352Raider
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Corleone wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 12:35 pm I really doubt Maxx has the value that some of you think he does. Two firsts is a pipe dream.
We got that for a much older Mack. But I agree, his value is a first and a day two pick (third that becomes a second if thee first we get is below pick 16)
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Hellbound wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 11:57 am I mean we can win 4 games with him or without him
That I can agree with.
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

Corleone wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 12:35 pm I really doubt Maxx has the value that some of you think he does. Two firsts is a pipe dream.
He's right there with Micah.
Post Reply