On to Washington

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
User avatar
RaiderandBulldog
Posts: 15,972
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: Fresno Ca
Has given High Fives: 228 times
Received High Fives: 383 times

On to Washington

Unread post by RaiderandBulldog »

As bad as last night was. The Raiders have to move on and do it quickly on a short week.

Even worst it’s an early start in the east coast against a team that had their minimum bye week. So they will be rested and had plenty of time to game plan for us.

This is an early big test.

View from the enemy
https://www.bgobsession.com/
User avatar
chucker
Posts: 16,767
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Has given High Fives: 1823 times
Received High Fives: 2454 times

Unread post by chucker »

LayneStaley wrote: Wed Sep 17, 2025 5:24 pm

Really hope that 38-9 is right.
I'm assuming that "prediction" is just a nod to the Raiders/Skins SB score. If you're gonna predict a Raider win, you may as well have fun with it.
These users gave a High Five to the author chucker for the post:
LayneStaley
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »



Good job Chip. 28th in attempts.
These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
FlyBono24
User avatar
KillerRaider30
Posts: 7,264
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:24 pm
Has given High Fives: 511 times
Received High Fives: 468 times

Unread post by KillerRaider30 »

LayneStaley wrote: Wed Sep 17, 2025 7:05 pm

Good job Chip. 28th in attempts.
Well the oline stinks and teams are stacking the box. I saw 10 Monday one time.
Untill the passing game comes out of cardiac arrest its the script for the season.

Defense surprisingly is not the problem. 3 picks and 20pts given up? Cheers
User avatar
Raidernation1979
Posts: 8,065
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 385 times
Received High Fives: 882 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

KillerRaider30 wrote: Wed Sep 17, 2025 7:30 pm Well the oline stinks and teams are stacking the box. I saw 10 Monday one time.
Untill the passing game comes out of cardiac arrest its the script for the season.

Defense surprisingly is not the problem. 3 picks and 20pts given up? Cheers
Jeanty had 1 negative run on Monday. 1 I think for no gain. They abandon him to early. Even when it can work.
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,105
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 713 times
Received High Fives: 253 times

Unread post by mranquales »

Watching film:

-On Geno's first pick, nothing was open. Great defense. Tre Tucker was technically the right read since he was the only WR that had any space, but Geno lead him instead of throwing a dart at his chest.

-On the forced pass to Tre Tucker who was double covered in the endzone, Jeanty had a step on his man in the flat. If Jeanty gets past him, there's nothing but daylight on the entire right side of the field. If you're Geno, you have to check it down there and see what the 6th overall pick can do.

-On the Khalil Mack sack play, Thornton was open and would have only had the middle third to beat for a TD.

-On our first red zone series, on the pass to Jakobi Meyers in the corner that got broken up, Jack Bech was on wide open on the right dig. The entire Chargers defense abandoned him, and the safety lazily trails him. If the pass goes that way, it's an easy TD.

Also, on that same play, Jeanty once again is 1v1 in the flat with no one on the right side of the field. The Raiders lined up on the left hash so there was a lot of space for Jeanty to reach into his tool bag to beat the LB for a TD or at the very least an easy first and goal (Raiders were at the 20).

-On the Thronton bomb, that was the right read. DTJ had his man beat, unfortunately, Geno Smith just doesn't have the arm strength, so he floats it, making it appear as if Thornton was covered. Still, it should have been PI.

-Meredith and Parham are the weak links when it comes to run blocking. A fact, which, should surprise no one.

-On the punt-interception, it turns out it wasn't Geno's fault. When Geno rolled to his right Thornton was wide open. It was the right read. Unfortunately, Thornton made a rookie mistake and instead of sitting on the curl he streaks, which forces Geno to try to hero ball it up to him. If Thornton stays where he is, we easily move the chains via him or Tre Tucker running the post.

Still, I would have liked for us to play conservative and check it down there. Dylan Laube was cooking that whole series and would have easily gotten 15+ yards as no one was around him. Move the chains and live to fight again.

-On the back shoulder throw to Meyers, Thornton was wide open on the zig, with major YAC potential (Again, right side of the field wide open). This is one of the few truly bad reads from Geno.

-On the forced pass to Meyers in the endzone, IMO, Tre Tucker should have been the read. Wouldn't have been the easiest pass, but you give your burner a chance on the corner route with the third hedging towards the middle of the field. Just like against the Patriots (granted, that play had more space).

As an aside, the defense played great on that play. Nothing was easy nor obvious. The smart play would be to play conservative and draw Jeanty up the middle with Derwin James bailing for the Tampa 2/Cover 3 middle zone. You either get the first or come away with 3 points. Instead, Geno throws a pick.

-On the play where Parham has a brainfart and decides to TRIPLE TEAM instead of blocking his matchup, the Chargers were playing strict cover 2. Thornton was wide open in the hole and Jakobi Meyers is also wide open in the middle of the field. Geno stares down Bowers and gets sacked.

-Chargers did a good job disguising their Tampa 2. Derwin James has elite IQ and lateral quickness, so he is able to turn that hook into a middle third, when necessary, which then allows the coach to fool the offense those rare times they actually ran cover 3.

-Every time the Raiders lined up on the left hash, the Chargers left the right side of the field open. I would have liked the Raiders to have taken advantage of that. Hopefully next time we face them.

Summary: The sky is not falling with Geno Smith. Yes, he had a bad game, but almost all of his decisions made sense. The main problem I see is that he simply doesn't have the throw power to make the deep threat viable. If Geno were 26 years old, Thornton has 2 TDs against the Chargers.

This will sound controversial, but I really like that he's giving the rookie a chance to make an impact and not just letting him be a decoy for Bowers, Jakobi Meyers, and Ashton Jeanty. Once Thornton and Geno get the chemistry down, he's going to put numbers up.
These users gave a High Five to the author mranquales for the post (total 2):
ALLRAIDERWORLD21, Jeevo
User avatar
Willmark
Posts: 14,513
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:27 pm
Location: Keeper of THE COIN!
Has given High Fives: 904 times
Received High Fives: 861 times

Unread post by Willmark »

ToastPatterson wrote: Tue Sep 16, 2025 8:51 pm Wife is a die hard Redskin fan. It's going to be a house divided. I'll probably end up watching it in my garage and pace around my driveway like a lunatic. Neighbors are used to it by now.
Same here with my wife, father was one too.
User avatar
Opoponax50
Posts: 5,408
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
Has given High Fives: 857 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by Opoponax50 »

Jeevo wrote: Wed Sep 17, 2025 5:40 pm Am I the only one who thinks Daniels is going to play?
We won't know until we know, but they probably think they can beat us without him, so why sacrifice a franchise QB in a week 3 game against a non-conference opponent?

I don't know if Daniels is all he's cracked up to be though. He hasn't looked much like he did in his rookie year. Year two is often the eye-opener. A season's worth of film and tendencies can be a shock (see our own Turd). Then it comes down to whether the player is able to adjust and how quickly.

We have a shot to win this one. I don't think it's probable, but it's not impossible, even if Daniels starts. I'm hoping that our offense is quickly evolving and being evaluated for what it's good at and what it's not good at. Getting Jeanty more reps would be great but you don't run the ball simply for the sake of it. It does the team no good to run him into a brick wall three times in a row. Hopefully our blocking scheme improves as it is because Pete ain't shitcanning his son for any reason.

That was the biggest red flag of the offseason.
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

@mranquales .

This is great breakdown.

Yeah it seems after two games Thorton is getting deep separation but Geno isn’t leading him or waiting too long to throw. I think if there is an opportunity where single high safety cheats to Tucker or opposite side WR going deep, Geno should fling it Thorton early and lead him to see what he can do.

Also, I saw somewhere that the Raider defense is the 3rd toughest team to covert a 1st down against on 3rd down. That’s inspiring being that offense is till trying to find an indentity.
These users gave a High Five to the author ALLRAIDERWORLD21 for the post:
mranquales
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

Good thing we drafted an elite RB high in the draft so that we could be 28th in rushing attempts through two games
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
nitroraider
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

User avatar
DrDUne
Posts: 4,580
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by DrDUne »

As expected;

User avatar
BoJacksonRules
Posts: 2,659
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
Has given High Fives: 360 times
Received High Fives: 203 times

Unread post by BoJacksonRules »

I just hope we don’t trot out the same starting Oline as last week. I’d rather they experiment with the lineup and fail than to just maintain the status quo that obviously isn’t working
These users gave a High Five to the author BoJacksonRules for the post:
RI RAIDER
User avatar
Raidernation1979
Posts: 8,065
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 am
Has given High Fives: 385 times
Received High Fives: 882 times

Unread post by Raidernation1979 »

DrDUne wrote: Thu Sep 18, 2025 10:10 am As expected;

Yeah. I think coach said he wouldn’t practice before Friday at all.
User avatar
Atlasffa
Posts: 12,092
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:41 am
Location: Just Win Baby!
Has given High Fives: 101 times
Received High Fives: 421 times

Unread post by Atlasffa »

User avatar
FLORIDARAYDAH
Posts: 7,901
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:38 pm
Has given High Fives: 808 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by FLORIDARAYDAH »

Jeevo wrote: Wed Sep 17, 2025 5:40 pm Am I the only one who thinks Daniels is going to play?
I think there is a good chance he plays. They said they are holding him put of practice until Friday. Unless he has a setback I expect to see him on Sunday.
Post Reply