Top 10 richest users

Game #1 at NE - Game and Post Game Thread

Las Vegas Raiders Discussion.
Born from RF.net ruins, resurrected as RF.com, now arriving at Raiderstation.
The #1 Las Vegas Raiders site on the web!
Post Reply
User avatar
RunOverByHubbard
Posts: 13,103
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 9:09 am
Location: 88 miles NE of the Coliseum
Has given High Fives: 106 times
Received High Fives: 574 times

Game #1 at NE - Game and Post Game Thread

Unread post by RunOverByHubbard »

Here we go - new coach, new QB, new exciting RB, and a no-name defense. Not the toughest opening day match up possible as the Patriots also have issues. We are clearly in rebuild mode right? So if we lose I hope this board doesn’t go into melt down mode. Have fun with the new product Raiders fans

May today be the dawning of a new winning tradition for this hallowed franchise that we love so much.
These users gave a High Five to the author RunOverByHubbard for the post (total 2):
Oaktown Superman, Vercingetorix
Top
User avatar
RickRyb
Posts: 1,530
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 11:21 am
Location: SoCal
Has given High Fives: 1271 times
Received High Fives: 529 times

Unread post by RickRyb »

SkullCrusher wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 8:33 am Olines need gel time as we know, new staff changes things up to. Not only the line getting better, but this is Chip's first time really seeing the offense in real games, hopefully there are things he see's here that can help it all out. He didn't call near a perfect game himself.

JPJ was preseason HOF material last year. I guess this is what you get when everyone felt he was a real strong bargain when we picked him and we were (still are) desperate for help here. We over-hyped him, he didn't earn it yet, hopefully he does.
It could be argued this is his 2nd year, it's his 2nd offensive/O-line scheme and he's playing a different position. Hopefully, it will click in for him and he becomes a mauler at guard.
These users gave a High Five to the author RickRyb for the post (total 2):
chucker, raiderboyron
Top
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

RickRyb wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:27 am It could be argued this is his 2nd year, it's his 2nd offensive/O-line scheme and he's playing a different position. Hopefully, it will click in for him and he becomes a mauler at guard.
Yep, plenty of time to get on track. Pretty much everyone on the team can come up with crazy coach/coordinator changes during their tenure. When it was said something like AOC had 5 coords in 3 years, that goes for everyone on the offense who's been with us that same period.
Top
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »





I don’t think it’s good that all 3 offensive worst were on the Oline.
Top
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 120 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

LayneStaley wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:57 am



I don’t think it’s good that all 3 offensive worst were on the Oline.
Nope,not good, well we did see that on the last offensive series when we were supposed to run out the clock.
Top
User avatar
ALLRAIDERWORLD21
Posts: 3,890
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
Has given High Fives: 434 times
Received High Fives: 566 times

Unread post by ALLRAIDERWORLD21 »

LayneStaley wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:57 am



I don’t think it’s good that all 3 offensive worst were on the Oline.
Wilson stepped up and had a key sack in crunch time.
Top
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 11:19 am Wilson stepped up and had a key sack in crunch time.
That was worth 49 points the rest of the game .1 points.

That was a nice sack.
Top
User avatar
DrDUne
Posts: 4,580
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
Has given High Fives: 142 times
Received High Fives: 463 times

Unread post by DrDUne »

LayneStaley wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:57 am



I don’t think it’s good that all 3 offensive worst were on the Oline.
Agreed. That being said, I assumed before the game that a Vrabel-coached team would not be "run" all over. Barmore, Williams, Landry, etc are a tough group. This does not absolve the Raiders o-line of needing to do better, I just believe this was a worthy Week 1 run defense. Needs to be better Week 2 if they want to keep Herbert & Co. off the field.
Top
User avatar
Attyla
Posts: 51,623
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
Has given High Fives: 1086 times
Received High Fives: 2636 times

Unread post by Attyla »

CWood24 wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 2:24 am The NFL coverage here isn’t the greatest at times over here

That’s my neck of the woods, where in Scotland are you?
Glasgow to start, heading out to Edinburgh tomorrow for a few days of knocking around, then finish up for two more days in Glasgow.
These users gave a High Five to the author Attyla for the post:
Willmark
Top
User avatar
Southshield
Posts: 2,467
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:52 am
Location: Concord, CA
Has given High Fives: 69 times
Received High Fives: 119 times

Unread post by Southshield »

JPJ is reminding me a lot of Jake Grove
Top
User avatar
LayneStaley
Posts: 4,310
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
Has given High Fives: 464 times
Received High Fives: 1033 times

Unread post by LayneStaley »

These users gave a High Five to the author LayneStaley for the post:
RunOverByHubbard
Top
User avatar
SkullCrusher
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Location: The Nation.
Has given High Fives: 409 times
Received High Fives: 466 times

Unread post by SkullCrusher »

I just read McDouche called 1 running play in the 2nd half, good lord. I double checked I see 3 runs in the 2nd half, still...
Top
User avatar
NoThanksSir
Posts: 8,377
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 6:59 am
Location: New Jersey
Has given High Fives: 522 times
Received High Fives: 569 times

Unread post by NoThanksSir »

RickRyb wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:27 am It could be argued this is his 2nd year, it's his 2nd offensive/O-line scheme and he's playing a different position. Hopefully, it will click in for him and he becomes a mauler at guard.
Hopefully they don't futz around with him any further and give him time to figure out RG. I'm not a fan of moving guys around but after seeing him play yesterday I totally understand him not being trusted to play center. If he is given time at guard he has the traits to succeed.
These users gave a High Five to the author NoThanksSir for the post:
chucker
Top
User avatar
Oaktownonly
Posts: 3,642
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
Has given High Fives: 402 times
Received High Fives: 431 times

Unread post by Oaktownonly »

SkullCrusher wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 12:43 pm I just read McDouche called 1 running play in the 2nd half, good lord. I double checked I see 3 runs in the 2nd half, still...
So glad he isn't here.
Top
User avatar
mranquales
Posts: 8,105
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
Has given High Fives: 713 times
Received High Fives: 253 times

Unread post by mranquales »

I don't even care for Tyree Wilson but him being ranked bottom 3 in PFF is an example of the click bait that I mentioned earlier.
Top
User avatar
raiderjohn
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2014 3:21 pm
Has given High Fives: 2 times
Received High Fives: 120 times

Unread post by raiderjohn »

Defensive Snap Count read (71 total )

Typical Pete Carroll, smaller rotation, very limited substitution. Less than half the plays we had 5 or more DBs.

DT Butler 61, Booker 42, Laulu 29, Hemingway 11
DE Crosby 71, Wilson 38, Koonce 32

DB Stokes, Kelly, Chinn and Pola-Mao got all 71 snaps

Holmes got 29 and Edmunds got 1.

White 71, Pratt 65, Adams 25, Eichenberg 14, Roberts 11
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The OG Raider Room”