Raiders trade CB Jakorian Bennett to Eagles
- DrDUne
- Posts: 4,580
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 8:51 pm
- Has given High Fives: 142 times
- Received High Fives: 463 times
Raiders trade CB Jakorian Bennett to Eagles
Trying to see what I can find out about Booker
- These users gave a High Five to the author DrDUne for the post (total 2):
- FLORIDARAYDAH, Oaktownonly
- pfish57
- Posts: 8,425
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:57 pm
- Has given High Fives: 400 times
- Received High Fives: 898 times
They might want to grab a CB or two lolLayneStaley wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 7:04 pm I think there will be some surprises during camp cuts and we will grab another DT then too.
- GoodTimeCharlie
- Posts: 4,584
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2020 6:26 pm
- Location: Atop the commode
- Has given High Fives: 1483 times
- Received High Fives: 1350 times
Coach Carroll has definitely got a type.LayneStaley wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 7:04 pm I think there will be some surprises during camp cuts and we will grab another DT then too.
Darien Porter 6’4”
Decamerion Richardson 6’3”
Sam Webb 6’3”
Eric Stokes 6’1”
Kyu Blu Kelly 6’1”
Darnay Holmes 5’11”
Jakorian Bennett 5’11”
Mr. Holmes, your time is short.
- These users gave a High Five to the author GoodTimeCharlie for the post (total 2):
- rich72, RI RAIDER
- ALLRAIDERWORLD21
- Posts: 3,890
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:02 pm
- Has given High Fives: 434 times
- Received High Fives: 566 times
UDFA Greedy Vance was shining at camp..as well as Decamarion Richardson has beee coming around, and Darien Porter looking like a starter. Plus FA vets Eric Stokes and Darney Holmes.
Stokes and Porter will be starters most likely with Holmes, Vance, and Richardson as backups. Theres still some solid vets unsigned FA as well. Gilmore, Samuel Jr, Rhodes, Slay Jr, Poyer. Wouldn’t be surprised if one of these guys end up being signed to have a vet in the CB room.
- RaiderandBulldog
- Posts: 15,972
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:18 pm
- Location: Fresno Ca
- Has given High Fives: 228 times
- Received High Fives: 383 times
Pete isn’t screwing around on sharping the roster the way he wants
- These users gave a High Five to the author RaiderandBulldog for the post:
- Curay7680
- Oaktownonly
- Posts: 3,642
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:32 am
- Has given High Fives: 402 times
- Received High Fives: 431 times
Moves very well for a guy who's 300+. Could be a good signing.
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,310
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 464 times
- Received High Fives: 1033 times
If Lane honestly thinks that this is an awesome trade.
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,753
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 225 times
- Received High Fives: 533 times
Let's see...Wilson, Fotu, Lauau, Carter, Hemingway, and now Booker.
Why? Booker is just another rotational player.
Raiders trade a guy on the back end is a head scratcher.
Why? Booker is just another rotational player.
Raiders trade a guy on the back end is a head scratcher.
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,753
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 225 times
- Received High Fives: 533 times
Porter has played 7 games as a CB. Dude is going to get his lunch ate when shit gets real.ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 7:51 pm UDFA Greedy Vance was shining at camp..as well as Decamarion Richardson has beee coming around, and Darien Porter looking like a starter. Plus FA vets Eric Stokes and Darney Holmes.
Stokes and Porter will be starters most likely with Holmes, Vance, and Richardson as backups. Theres still some solid vets unsigned FA as well. Gilmore, Samuel Jr, Rhodes, Slay Jr, Poyer. Wouldn’t be surprised if one of these guys end up being signed to have a vet in the CB room.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Sold My Soul for the post:
- pfish57
- mranquales
- Posts: 8,105
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:47 pm
- Has given High Fives: 713 times
- Received High Fives: 253 times
Told you.
Bennet should have never been drafted in the first place, I don't judge him for the mistakes of the staff. 6'2 Ringo would still be on the roster. Oh well, hope Bennet enjoys his last couple of years in the league before he's working a 9-5.
Bennet should have never been drafted in the first place, I don't judge him for the mistakes of the staff. 6'2 Ringo would still be on the roster. Oh well, hope Bennet enjoys his last couple of years in the league before he's working a 9-5.
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,310
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 464 times
- Received High Fives: 1033 times
Maybe they made this trade because they are gonna sign a vet still on the street to backup some of the young guys.
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,753
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 225 times
- Received High Fives: 533 times
Bennett isn't a good tackler (185th out of 207 cornerbacks, per Pro Football Focus), but is proficient in coverage. Last season, opposing quarterbacks targeting Bennett had just a 52.1 passer rating with him in coverage -- as he allowed zero touchdown passes and zero interceptions. Bennett allowed just 4.4 yards per attempt as opposing quarterbacks completed only 45% of their passes thrown his way.
Ringo's struggles with the deep ball in coverage this training camp are why the Eagles felt prompted to acquire Bennett
Bennett is now certainly in the mix for the starting outside cornerback job opposite Mitchell. He has four weeks to get acclimated to the system and surpass Ringo and Jackson.
Parting ways with a proven commodity like Bennett doesn't make sense, but a new coaching staff and new system means other players get better opportunities. If Bennett was cut, he would have been claimed -- so the Eagles parted ways with a player at a position with depth.
Ringo's struggles with the deep ball in coverage this training camp are why the Eagles felt prompted to acquire Bennett
Bennett is now certainly in the mix for the starting outside cornerback job opposite Mitchell. He has four weeks to get acclimated to the system and surpass Ringo and Jackson.
Parting ways with a proven commodity like Bennett doesn't make sense, but a new coaching staff and new system means other players get better opportunities. If Bennett was cut, he would have been claimed -- so the Eagles parted ways with a player at a position with depth.
- CWood24
- Posts: 3,970
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
- Has given High Fives: 15 times
- Received High Fives: 365 times
These are the exact type of moves Pete made in Seattle so not that shocking
Booker was a rotational piece for the best DL in football so at least we know he can contribute at that level, now it is for Carroll, Graham & Leonard to develop that further
I liked Bennett & how he developed into a solid player last year but if he wasn’t going to be used in our system then better to move him for someone else
Always thought that Porter & Richardson would get alot of reps this year being that they are is Pete’s CB prototype - tall, long & fast.
Booker was a rotational piece for the best DL in football so at least we know he can contribute at that level, now it is for Carroll, Graham & Leonard to develop that further
I liked Bennett & how he developed into a solid player last year but if he wasn’t going to be used in our system then better to move him for someone else
Always thought that Porter & Richardson would get alot of reps this year being that they are is Pete’s CB prototype - tall, long & fast.
- CWood24
- Posts: 3,970
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:17 am
- Has given High Fives: 15 times
- Received High Fives: 365 times
Someone is gonna lose it if Bennett end up getting the nod over Ringo after all the talking they didSold My Soul wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 9:20 pm Bennett isn't a good tackler (185th out of 207 cornerbacks, per Pro Football Focus), but is proficient in coverage. Last season, opposing quarterbacks targeting Bennett had just a 52.1 passer rating with him in coverage -- as he allowed zero touchdown passes and zero interceptions. Bennett allowed just 4.4 yards per attempt as opposing quarterbacks completed only 45% of their passes thrown his way.
Ringo's struggles with the deep ball in coverage this training camp are why the Eagles felt prompted to acquire Bennett
Bennett is now certainly in the mix for the starting outside cornerback job opposite Mitchell. He has four weeks to get acclimated to the system and surpass Ringo and Jackson.
Parting ways with a proven commodity like Bennett doesn't make sense, but a new coaching staff and new system means other players get better opportunities. If Bennett was cut, he would have been claimed -- so the Eagles parted ways with a player at a position with depth.
- These users gave a High Five to the author CWood24 for the post (total 2):
- Sold My Soul, Pfish252000
- Sold My Soul
- Posts: 17,753
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere In Time
- Has given High Fives: 225 times
- Received High Fives: 533 times
Pete loves em long tall and fast, and obviously green. No substitute for experience especially with the QB's in our division.
Hard to replicate these numbers...
Among NFL CBs with 450+ snaps, Bennett ranked the following:
18 recs allowed (3rd)
37 targets (Tied-10th)
176 yards allowed (2nd)
0 TD allowed (Tied-1st)
9 PBU (Tied-4th)
62.4 QBR (6th)
Hard to replicate these numbers...
Among NFL CBs with 450+ snaps, Bennett ranked the following:
18 recs allowed (3rd)
37 targets (Tied-10th)
176 yards allowed (2nd)
0 TD allowed (Tied-1st)
9 PBU (Tied-4th)
62.4 QBR (6th)