Jack Bech Still Not Signed [Signed on 7/17 pg 8]
- Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,408
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 857 times
- Received High Fives: 463 times
Jack Bech Still Not Signed [Signed on 7/17 pg 8]
From what I heard, because the Texans gave their 2nd round WR a guaranteed contract, Bech is holding out for that.
Mandatory OTAs are next week and it doesn't appear that we're making any headway with Bech. It's easy to say just sign him and get him onboard, but it sets a shitty precedent wherein 2nd rounders at any position are going to want guaranteed contracts, which means that even if they completely bust, we're stuck with the cap hit.
I absolutely believe that players need to make as much $ as possible, but 2nd round players still have a lot to prove, and Bech is no different. The longer this holdout goes on though, the worse his bargaining position gets. It also doesn't endear him to the coaching staff and other players.
As the general rule stands right now, high second round picks usually get paid around $10,000,000, so if the guy shows promise in the first couple of years, but then shits the bed, he'll still most likely get a chance to finish out his contract, which would net him around $5-6 million.
I don't want to sour on the guy just yet, but this situation certainly isn't helping.
Mandatory OTAs are next week and it doesn't appear that we're making any headway with Bech. It's easy to say just sign him and get him onboard, but it sets a shitty precedent wherein 2nd rounders at any position are going to want guaranteed contracts, which means that even if they completely bust, we're stuck with the cap hit.
I absolutely believe that players need to make as much $ as possible, but 2nd round players still have a lot to prove, and Bech is no different. The longer this holdout goes on though, the worse his bargaining position gets. It also doesn't endear him to the coaching staff and other players.
As the general rule stands right now, high second round picks usually get paid around $10,000,000, so if the guy shows promise in the first couple of years, but then shits the bed, he'll still most likely get a chance to finish out his contract, which would net him around $5-6 million.
I don't want to sour on the guy just yet, but this situation certainly isn't helping.
- Opoponax50
- Posts: 5,408
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2020 9:16 am
- Has given High Fives: 857 times
- Received High Fives: 463 times
[quote=GoodTimeCharlie post_id=1290056]”All The News That’s Fit To Print”
This “Real Housewives-ing” got me to a thinkin’. I imagine “Live” will be hands-down everyone’s favorite way to watch sports outside of the contrarian for contrarian’s sake folk. “Where” might be different. At my age, with the cost, finding parking, and a general distaste for the majority of humanity, I find Home to be the perfect viewing venue. It’s at its most entertaining for me, at home with friends.
What about reading though? When would you say you got the most bang-for-your-buck entertainment-wise? Reflecting has me believing I enjoyed my sports consumption via reading at the long heyday of “Sports Illustrated”. Weekly sports absorption would be the peak in my opinion. I would be excited popping open the mail and seeing it in there. I’d devour it at once, and spend the rest of the week rereading it on the pot. And that swimsuit issue, good Lord. There was an age when that thing was pure gold.
What say you RF?
https://content.imageresizer.com/images ... meme-1.jpg
P.S. This post brought to you by the “Offseason”.[/quote]SI and all other printed publications were great because you had an overview of the most relevant stories in most sports. You also had the letters to the editor and the op-ed piece at the end. If the Raiders showed up on the cover, it was a huge bonus--except for that classic still photo of the Bills defense smashing Jay Schroeder to a pulp in real time (let's never discuss it again). Anyway, when I was whippersnapper I'd sometimes take SI to a bar, sit there by myself, and read it cover to cover. And yes, the swimsuit edition was always a big deal. Even women looked at to see who the likely upcoming next big thing in modeling was going to be.
I know it's nostalgic as hell, but I sincerely believe it was a better time. Now you have assholes bringing up irrelevant subjects like Jack Bech being unsigned.
This “Real Housewives-ing” got me to a thinkin’. I imagine “Live” will be hands-down everyone’s favorite way to watch sports outside of the contrarian for contrarian’s sake folk. “Where” might be different. At my age, with the cost, finding parking, and a general distaste for the majority of humanity, I find Home to be the perfect viewing venue. It’s at its most entertaining for me, at home with friends.
What about reading though? When would you say you got the most bang-for-your-buck entertainment-wise? Reflecting has me believing I enjoyed my sports consumption via reading at the long heyday of “Sports Illustrated”. Weekly sports absorption would be the peak in my opinion. I would be excited popping open the mail and seeing it in there. I’d devour it at once, and spend the rest of the week rereading it on the pot. And that swimsuit issue, good Lord. There was an age when that thing was pure gold.
What say you RF?
https://content.imageresizer.com/images ... meme-1.jpg
P.S. This post brought to you by the “Offseason”.[/quote]SI and all other printed publications were great because you had an overview of the most relevant stories in most sports. You also had the letters to the editor and the op-ed piece at the end. If the Raiders showed up on the cover, it was a huge bonus--except for that classic still photo of the Bills defense smashing Jay Schroeder to a pulp in real time (let's never discuss it again). Anyway, when I was whippersnapper I'd sometimes take SI to a bar, sit there by myself, and read it cover to cover. And yes, the swimsuit edition was always a big deal. Even women looked at to see who the likely upcoming next big thing in modeling was going to be.
I know it's nostalgic as hell, but I sincerely believe it was a better time. Now you have assholes bringing up irrelevant subjects like Jack Bech being unsigned.
- Toast
- Posts: 2,707
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:59 pm
- Has given High Fives: 554 times
- Received High Fives: 1004 times
I also enjoyed The Sporting News. The money I made mowing lawns as a kid funded my weekly SI and TSN subscriptions. The Street & Smith NFL and MLB season previews were a big deal as well.
Journalism had a professional standard in those days, And yes, it was a much better time.
Journalism had a professional standard in those days, And yes, it was a much better time.
- These users gave a High Five to the author Toast for the post:
- Vercingetorix
- Trainnvain
- Posts: 1,392
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
- Has given High Fives: 240 times
- Received High Fives: 160 times
[quote=ToastPatterson post_id=1290063]I also enjoyed The Sporting News. The money I made mowing lawns as a kid funded my weekly SI and TSN subscriptions. The Street & Smith NFL and MLB season previews were a big deal as well.
Journalism had a professional standard in those days, And yes, it was a much better time.[/quote]TSN was my go to along with SI. TSNs baseball coverage was great, I remember pouring over the box scores for the week and checking out the top ten lists for both leagues as well as their misc facts columns. Being from the Bay Area, I also miss the Sporting Green from the Chron., they had great columnists and beat reporters
Journalism had a professional standard in those days, And yes, it was a much better time.[/quote]TSN was my go to along with SI. TSNs baseball coverage was great, I remember pouring over the box scores for the week and checking out the top ten lists for both leagues as well as their misc facts columns. Being from the Bay Area, I also miss the Sporting Green from the Chron., they had great columnists and beat reporters
- haji81872
- Posts: 4,016
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2018 9:23 am
- Has given High Fives: 119 times
- Received High Fives: 400 times
[quote=Opoponax50 post_id=1290061]SI and all other printed publications were great because you had an overview of the most relevant stories in most sports. You also had the letters to the editor and the op-ed piece at the end. If the Raiders showed up on the cover, it was a huge bonus--except for that classic still photo of the Bills defense smashing Jay Schroeder to a pulp in real time (let's never discuss it again). Anyway, when I was whippersnapper I'd sometimes take SI to a bar, sit there by myself, and read it cover to cover. And yes, the swimsuit edition was always a big deal. Even women looked at to see who the likely upcoming next big thing in modeling was going to be.
I know it's nostalgic as hell, but I sincerely believe it was a better time. Now you have assholes bringing up irrelevant subjects like Jack Bech being unsigned.[/quote]I saved all my SI for years in the late 80's and early 90's. Every time we move or I am told to clean out the storage room I pretty much find the box, open it, and spend all my time going through them all.
I know it's nostalgic as hell, but I sincerely believe it was a better time. Now you have assholes bringing up irrelevant subjects like Jack Bech being unsigned.[/quote]I saved all my SI for years in the late 80's and early 90's. Every time we move or I am told to clean out the storage room I pretty much find the box, open it, and spend all my time going through them all.
- Attyla
- Posts: 51,623
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:31 pm
- Has given High Fives: 1086 times
- Received High Fives: 2636 times
[quote=haji81872 post_id=1290071]I saved all my SI for years in the late 80's and early 90's. Every time we move or I am told to clean out the storage room I pretty much find the box, open it, and spend all my time going through them all.[/quote]I did the same with all my old man's playboy mags. He of course got them for the articles, stereo systems and fine quality booze reviews are why you get that magazine.
- ELCAraiderfan
- Posts: 2,673
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:38 pm
- Has given High Fives: 317 times
- Received High Fives: 125 times
[quote=Attyla post_id=1290072]I did the same with all my old man's playboy mags. He of course got them for the articles, stereo systems and fine quality booze reviews are why you get that magazine.[/quote]When I was in high school in the 70's I used to stay at my Grandfather's house for pre-season two a days in August.
Granddad had every Playboy magazine starting with Marilyn. It was a great two weeks. I went through every one of them.
Granddad got Playboy for the tits, ass and bush. He was a Renaissance man, who's Iron Worker nickname was Devil.
Those were the days, coming over to Granddad's house for family get togethers with the current issue of Playboy on the coffee table. The good old days man
Granddad had every Playboy magazine starting with Marilyn. It was a great two weeks. I went through every one of them.
Granddad got Playboy for the tits, ass and bush. He was a Renaissance man, who's Iron Worker nickname was Devil.
Those were the days, coming over to Granddad's house for family get togethers with the current issue of Playboy on the coffee table. The good old days man
- These users gave a High Five to the author ELCAraiderfan for the post:
- Vercingetorix
- raider_kin
- Posts: 3,663
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2132 times
- Received High Fives: 908 times
[quote=Trainnvain post_id=1290064]TSN was my go to along with SI. TSNs baseball coverage was great, I remember pouring over the box scores for the week and checking out the top ten lists for both leagues as well as their misc facts columns. Being from the Bay Area, I also miss the Sporting Green from the Chron., they had great columnists and beat reporters[/quote]Damn, The Sporting Green is gone? Used to read that when visiting my gram and gramp in Napa.
- Trainnvain
- Posts: 1,392
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:00 pm
- Has given High Fives: 240 times
- Received High Fives: 160 times
[quote=raider_kin post_id=1290081]Damn, The Sporting Green is gone? Used to read that when visiting my gram and gramp in Napa.[/quote]I guess it’s not gone gone, the Chron still exists but, like all daily papers, it’s a shell of its former self. I haven’t picked up a newspaper in well over ten years. I remember when it was printed on green paper so it was easy to pull that section out. Last time I checked it just had a green border across the top
- raider_kin
- Posts: 3,663
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 8:01 am
- Has given High Fives: 2132 times
- Received High Fives: 908 times
[quote=Trainnvain post_id=1290083]I guess it’s not gone gone, the Chron still exists but, like all daily papers, it’s a shell of its former self. I haven’t picked up a newspaper in well over ten years. I remember when it was printed on green paper so it was easy to pull that section out. Last time I checked it just had a green border across the top[/quote]Yup, my grampa was amused at how cool I thought the green paper looked! 
- srv5490
- Posts: 3,471
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:14 pm
- Location: Returning Videotapes
- Has given High Fives: 87 times
- Received High Fives: 258 times
[quote=Trainnvain post_id=1290064]I also miss the Sporting Green from the Chron., they had great columnists and beat reporters[/quote]That and the pink section from the Sunday paper to see who was playing in the local clubs, Day on the Green, etc.
- chucker
- Posts: 16,767
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
- Has given High Fives: 1823 times
- Received High Fives: 2454 times
[quote=Opoponax50 post_id=1290061]SI and all other printed publications were great because you had an overview of the most relevant stories in most sports. You also had the letters to the editor and the op-ed piece at the end. If the Raiders showed up on the cover, it was a huge bonus--except for that classic still photo of the Bills defense smashing Jay Schroeder to a pulp in real time (let's never discuss it again). Anyway, when I was whippersnapper I'd sometimes take SI to a bar, sit there by myself, and read it cover to cover. And yes, the swimsuit edition was always a big deal. Even women looked at to see who the likely upcoming next big thing in modeling was going to be.
I know it's nostalgic as hell, but I sincerely believe it was a better time. Now you have assholes bringing up irrelevant subjects like Jack Bech being unsigned.[/quote]The guy who started that Jack Bech thread is such an asshole.
I know it's nostalgic as hell, but I sincerely believe it was a better time. Now you have assholes bringing up irrelevant subjects like Jack Bech being unsigned.[/quote]The guy who started that Jack Bech thread is such an asshole.
- powski
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 3:24 pm
- Has given High Fives: 91 times
- Received High Fives: 37 times
-
Contact:
Contact powskiHe could be a bust, but I dont see it. Ill bet on this guy to work hard and contribute.
I think he'll at least be solid, but the upside is hard to tell, how high the ceiling is.
Also, growing up my favorite sports reading was The Baseball Abstract by Bill James starting around 1984. It was self-published the first year and really took off from. I liked him as a writer, that always tried to avoid the tired and obvious sports talking and thinking.
- Cruisin with Tooz
- Posts: 1,456
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:43 am
- Has given High Fives: 191 times
- Received High Fives: 408 times