Raiders transaction thread
- HesterLayes
- Posts: 6,059
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 3:46 pm
- Has given High Fives: 19 times
- Received High Fives: 170 times
Raiders transaction thread
If this isn't ok,please remove. would be nice to have just our moves so it's easier to keep track of. please and thank you.
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,122
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 968 times
- Received High Fives: 535 times
I have never been a fan of Jones TBH. I appreciate his ball hawk mentality but he takes far to many chances (and usually comes out on the losing side). I think we needed Johnson either way. Losing Nate was already a loss. Hopefully one of the kids takes a step up this season.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
There are a few corners just as good still out there. I hope we sign one post draft
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 18,901
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 353 times
- Received High Fives: 236 times
[quote=DrDUne post_id=1283080]https://twitter.com/vinnybonsignore/sta ... 9ctUMJFY_Q[/quote]Fair thee well...
- LayneStaley
- Posts: 4,310
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:29 pm
- Has given High Fives: 464 times
- Received High Fives: 1033 times
- 16 to 88
- Posts: 18,901
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:23 pm
- Location: Dog House
- Has given High Fives: 353 times
- Received High Fives: 236 times
[quote=DrDUne post_id=1283080]https://twitter.com/vinnybonsignore/sta ... 9ctUMJFY_Q[/quote]Thanks for the information.
Fair thee well...
Fair thee well...
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
[quote=RI RAIDER post_id=1283088]I have never been a fan of Jones TBH. I appreciate his ball hawk mentality but he takes far to many chances (and usually comes out on the losing side). I think we needed Johnson either way. Losing Nate was already a loss. Hopefully one of the kids takes a step up this season.[/quote]Same...I thought we had a gem at first because he had some huge interceptions. But he tries to anticipate and jump the route and gets burned far too often...plus, he's not a tackler...he's a grabber.
Not at all concerned about him leaving.
Not at all concerned about him leaving.
- BoJacksonRules
- Posts: 2,659
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2019 1:48 pm
- Has given High Fives: 360 times
- Received High Fives: 203 times
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,122
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 968 times
- Received High Fives: 535 times
[quote=DrDUne post_id=1283098]No chance they’re going into the season with Bennett, Stokes, and Richardson as the guys they’re counting on. Still don’t think they’ll go CB at 6, but who knows![/quote]Maybe they go CB at 4.
- RI RAIDER
- Posts: 6,122
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:34 am
- Has given High Fives: 968 times
- Received High Fives: 535 times
Could Hunter be in play? I must admit, I do not like the announcement about Jones. This is something the last administration would have done. No way anyone is going to trade for him.
- tatalalicious
- Posts: 1,143
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:43 pm
- Has given High Fives: 83 times
- Received High Fives: 114 times
[quote=raidersince63 post_id=1283096]Same...I thought we had a gem at first because he had some huge interceptions. But he tries to anticipate and jump the route and gets burned far too often...plus, he's not a tackler...he's a grabber.
Not at all concerned about him leaving.[/quote]They definitely need to upgrade the DB group. I'll be happy if they draft Johnson with the 6th or one of the other D-Lineman depending on who's there.
Not at all concerned about him leaving.[/quote]They definitely need to upgrade the DB group. I'll be happy if they draft Johnson with the 6th or one of the other D-Lineman depending on who's there.
[quote=BoJacksonRules post_id=1283099]Then he’ll sign with the Chiefs and have Pick 6 ‘s against us[/quote]Da Fuque?
Cutting a guy that makes another hole that needs filling without his replacement on roster is bad management.
Cutting a guy that makes another hole that needs filling without his replacement on roster is bad management.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
[quote=tatalalicious post_id=1283102]They definitely need to upgrade the DB group. I'll be happy if they draft Johnson with the 6th or one of the other D-Lineman depending on who's there.[/quote]For me, last year our DBs could've had more success if we had been able to be more consistent in putting real pressure on the opposing QB. Maxx got double teamed quite often, so we could use some improvement from his team mates on the DL.
- DanKD
- Posts: 3,225
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:18 pm
- Has given High Fives: 39 times
- Received High Fives: 1090 times
I said it before, round 1 of free agency is over. Round 2 begins post draft. We have a ton of money to work with and I expect a lot of players still to be added.
- raidersince63
- Posts: 1,692
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2024 6:31 am
- Has given High Fives: 925 times
- Received High Fives: 656 times
[quote=BigJerk post_id=1283104]Da Fuque?
Cutting a guy that makes another hole that needs filling without his replacement on roster is bad management.[/quote]I'm sure they thought about that beforehand...and gotta believe they already have plans in mind for replacement.
Cutting a guy that makes another hole that needs filling without his replacement on roster is bad management.[/quote]I'm sure they thought about that beforehand...and gotta believe they already have plans in mind for replacement.